Member Info for Intrusivethought

You think $90m for the entire company is a better shareholder return? God help you.

That's my take on it too Nanonano.

Intriguing indeed, but a reminder that QD Vision failed.

F the press releases, if he's so confident of his case then initiate litigation proceedings. He won't, he'll lose.

Yes. I've looked into it. Not material on their own.

It is. Don't deny there are legitimate concerns re the whole litigation communications and who was 'in the know', but this guy just wants a smash and grab for the benefit of HIS OWN pocket. No thanks.

Immediate shareholder interests vs medium to long-term shareholder interests. Wait and see is all I'm saying. It may transpire that the decision to settle was the correct one. Electronics market will dwarf display.

I was as dissapointed as the next man, but hamoodi knows nothing of the underlying technologhy. He was here solely for the litigation payout. Just F-off back to your yacht know fella. The potential organic prize here is huge, please don't F it up for us.

Nanoco will be the only industrial-scale producer of high quality 2D nanomaterials for use in a wide range of electronics applications, including semiconductor chips. You heard it here first. Hold tight.

Imagine Nanoco's materials be utilised in lithium-ion batteries. The size of that market alone... and just one of many "huge international electronics markets." Hold tight.

Did they share all of their secrets? Also, the use of just one of their potential (yes potential) 2D materials in a mass consumer electronics product will see the share price explode. All other efforts have been and are confined to the laboratory/small scale. Nanoco have the IP to produce congruent, uniform (defect or defect free, core/shell and surface chemistry etc) 2D nanoparticles of any required shape and material, at an industrial scale. It is truly pioneering technology. Time will tell but I'm bullish about our future prospects.

Some relatively chunky trades today. Nothing more to add. Good night.

Yeah, pure guess.

Nanosys are infringing. Odd that company purporting to be a pioneer and commercially successful, has not listed on the Nasdaq but instead sought other methods of finance.

Don't know, but at a time when very likely in discussions re infringement of Nanoco's technology.

Https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230510005359/en/Nanosys-Announces-Martin-Devenney-as-New-CEO

Hartlove stepping down.

Efficient infringement. All of Big Tech engage in it. Samsung particularly so. C**ts.

That's kind. It is what it is. Genetics I'm afraid.

48. However, very poor heart health.