Member Info for Intrusivethought

We're shaking in our boots. Sleep well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n87msBVVJ2o

Lol Hammi. Can't remove Nanoco's board of directors, so resort to removing posters on this board instead. Go for it fella... it's some sort of consolation I guess.

Up all night....... cut and paste...... cut and paste.

Absolutely spot on Nanonano. My position also.

Good luck.

Will do Hammi. No evidence to substantiate your claims and allegations I see. Anyway, good day to you and good luck with your attempts to overhaul the board.

Got to give it to Hammi.... he's a relentless c**t. It's a bank holiday. You should be relaxing on your yacht.

Excellent effort.

Face id image sensor is ST is it not? AMS proximity sensor?

Totally logical. Makes sense.

2d nanomaterials trouble. That's is my belief and why I remain invested.

Near-term prospects with regard to material A are unaffected. We have known that for some time. But what of the sensor prospects beyond material A and 2d materials. Nanoco were not engaged by significant entities for material A only. A is just the beginning. Had the core platform IP been invalidated then sensor prospects would have been severely damaged.

Why would there need to be any direct link between compounds?

Yeah, with material A. Did you think validation meant materials A B and C concurrently? What happens to the devolment relationship had the tech related to B and C deemed invalid?

F*ck me backwards. Why do you think they have engaged with Nanoco? It's not just for one generation of product. Good try.

Oh, and the answer is yes.... the platform technology was validated.

Thank god for that. Good luck with your attempts to remove the board.

Was the platform technology validated?

Book value of 400k.

And the scope was narrowed for the purposes of the trial. You know that. Tell me, has the platform technology been validated, yes or no?