Member Info for Intrusivethought

They indicated a firm intention in the settlement RNS.

An intention to return some of the proceeds was communicated before Hammi's allegations surfaced. And allegations is all they are right now. Where is the concrete evidence? It is far too early, given that the settlement was only in February, to consider removing the board (and Nigel Pickett, God forbid). We do not know the nature of the confidential aspects of the settlement. In terms of our future prospects, the settlement may very well have been the right decision. But that is of no concern to Hammi. He was in for the quick return from the litigation. He is now effectively wanting a quick return from the sale of the company's assets. Who are his backers in this endeavour? Who really wants control of the company? The technology is utterly exceptional. Pioneering. Particularly wrt 2D materials.

Beware the asset stripper and HIS pursuit for HIS short-term gain.

The 20th June RNS also states the following:

"If the Group's prospects improve further or the self-financing point arises earlier than 2025, the Board will consider further returns of capital in line with developing an appropriate dividend policy for a profitable and cash generative business."

It's an expectation. Can't really be unequivocal. I do understand the frustration though.

Possibility of cash breakeven 2025 was guided before. Hammi seems to be almost as misleading as he claims the Board to be. But then DD isn't really his forte is it.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/NANO/trading-update-proposed-fundraise-beynh75a3iy9cjk.html

I support Tariq. His extensive knowledge of material science and the electronics market lead me to trust his proposals. With the removal of Dr Nigel Pickett and with the added guidance of our Tariq, the new high-calibre directorship is guaranteed to transform Nanoco into the leading, highly profitable, developer and producer of nanomaterials for advanced electronic applications.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IR-wuwqJr0g

Btw, 2D QDs are relevant to both PL and EL display applications. Indeed, the PL performance metrics are far superior to that of 0D QDs (both cad and cad free).

Nanoco's indium-alloy cfqds are quaternary structures and their green dots are the best out there. Who'd have thunk it?!

Https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20221007PD200/2nm-apple-tsmc.html

https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/research-news/cea-leti-and-intel-put-2d-materials-on-300mm-wafers-for-nano-sheet-transistors-2023-06/

Watch this space very closely. As I mentioned previously, initially silicon nanosheets but progressing on to 2D materials, TMDCs etc.

Oh dear.

Touché.

Respectfully amer..... but WTF?

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbOx8TyvUmI

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtzhvJh9NRY

You've been in for 10 mins and enough is enough. Really? All this effort to take control of the company for YOUR own interests. We should all remove the board and give the thumbs up to YOUR proposed directors and strategy. Who the f*ck are you?

Seeking to recoup his money or seeking to gain control of a company on the verge of something special? .......... I wonder. How quickly you convened your proposed cohort of replacement directors. Not chance Pickett would remain.

Here's one I prepared earlier.

Lol. Wouldn't surprise me at all.

Buckle up my lambs.

It wasn't me.