Member Info for Intrusivethought

You're so confident that you continue to post on BBs in order to garner support for your coup, hey Tariq. Dr Pickett to be replaced as CTO by Chemical Ali. Game over for the business if it happens.

Yes, we should all vote to give undue influence and control of the company to you, a disgruntled chancer and nanotechnology dullard, and your vulture backers so expeditiously assembled. They will operate with our interest at heart..... promise.

CFQD = IRQD. God knows what you think 2d nanomaterials are and their applications in electronics. Go on Tariq, give it a go... you just might persuade me of your credentials. Darn it, if only you were CEO, Nanoco would be a £bn enterprise today.

Now, have a cuppa and then get back to preparing your next post. Same time tomorrow? Copy and paste.

Maybe you should have also spent days thoroughly reviewing the court documents. Where is you presentation on that Tariq? Oops.

The only thing you care about, Tariq, is the short-term share price so that you can exit your highly leveraged position as soon as possible. Smash and grab. To hell with the business and other PI's.

You mean your own presentation. Copy and paste.

Good man.

LOL!!! I'll leave that for you to decide, Koob.

More critical than our Tariq, inventor of diddly-squat, was unable to comprehend the damages models as set out in the Court documents, continued to make further purchases even after Jan 9th when it was still possible to sell for more than he bought in for, and who knows f**k all about the core technology and its applications.

I think I'll stick with Nigel, thanks all the same. Your intention is to exploit PI disappointment in order to enable you and your backers to seize control of pioneering technology without actually having to buy the company outright. My oh my how quickly you convened your proposed consortium to replace the current Board.

The technical staff have intimate knowledge of the core technology, do they? They should be able to continue without disruption? You can guarantee that can you? CFQD=IRQD remember.

Our Tariq, the nanomaterials Moses, will lead us to the promised land. Just don't ask him about the materials and their applications. Sell the IRQD factory? Amen.

Bingo.

Dear Tariq, you and your Chief Technical Officer designate have form:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4n8FiPJOOY

PS- mutual acquaintances Tariq... it's a small world.

Our Tariq. Let's hand over the reins of the company to the chap who thinks that the sensing materials are the same CFQD materials as used in display applications.

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6XiqJxn9N4

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJRP3LRcUFg

LOL!

The company are working on low power, broadband, high speed photodetectors / optical interconnects for use in AI/machine learning systems and data centres. Eventually on-chip silicon photonics.

qdnano, the very same. #chancer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTMGG6NiEeQ&t=235s

And FY24 or FY25 was the STATED timeframe referred to. Don't start extrapolating your own crap. Jesus Christ Hammi, sorry nanostory, did you remortgage your house or something? Bloody hell.

LOL! Evidence.

Evidence to back up the claims might help.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/NANO/litigation-settlement-update-jvhg1g3i8fiqqm1.html

"In deciding the allocation of the net proceeds, the Board will balance any investment needs of Nanoco's growing organic business with a firm intention to deliver a material return of capital to shareholders."

Yes, all within the FY24 or FY25 timeframe.