Member Info for Intrusivethought

Can you present any EVIDENCE of illegality?

The 17 core patents that you claim have been sold please? Surely you're not lying are you?

Would they not have advised to settle in the first instance then?

Evidence please of childhood friend relationship etc? And the 17 core patents? Come on Hammi.

Nanostory, the 17 core patents claimed to have been sold to Samsung please?

No you won't.

Nanostory, the 17 patents?

You won't.

Wait and see people. Will be pleasantly surprised.

The 17 patents nanostory?

So Nanoco initiated the formal sale process following an offer from Samsung? Oh dear, more lies.

So Samsung made a formal offer did they? Err no they didn't. More mistruths from another come lately.

Nope.

NPV analysis is almost pointless for a pre-revenue company.

Nope.

Their patents suggest otherwise.

It's a risk, but we cannot be certain that Nanoco does not have in-house device expertise and/or live collaborations with those that do.

Try reading. Yeah ok then, QD-OLED = ELQD.

Goodness me. QD-OLED is not ELQD.

Anything by Turner Poop is likey total sh*te. Suffice to say they are not in the Premier League of brokers. It was they that suggested over 20 million TVs sold in the US alone.