Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
star****t how is yours and ahs and bobsucks constant trolling improving the bb ??
theres never any serious comments from any of you, just spitefulness
Looks like they ran out after the last few quick succession videos (Thus 25th last one).
Hopefully we will hear some "ACTUAL" news this month now.
Lets see if it holds today, it didnt yesterday, seemed to get reversed later on
I think Gsa are just covering a long position on QBT with their short, probably because the long position is in loss.
Its going with the trades, lots of buying this morning (maybe people with He1 profits who knows) but the buying pushed the SP up quickly then the sellers woke up and it dropped back.
can't really call this a P and D and compare to He1 that did a 10 bag in 4 trading days LOL
All waiting for Friday now Bob when you reckon there will be a placing at 1p and you will take a loss on your HUGE £744 investment .... weird that buying at 1.19 when you think it will be 1p on friday ??
Lets see shall we
Oooh that looks like bad timing from them (they started shorting at 1.1p)... who was commenting that if Gsa were shorting they must know something
mmmm even the professionals get it wrong
Neither has your sad sad childish comebacks. Why not try and get a life ?
Yes but the increase of £15k that the trolls wet their pants about last night is a pittance .... I suspect the whole 0.62% is covering a long position. I cant see anyone trying to carry out a significant short attack on QBT at this point, should have done it when it spiked to 3p
0.11% is only 1.4 million shares (about £15k).... weakest short attach ever :)
Next X video today or tomorrow .... personally I'd rather not see another one.
Ah well done another one of your 1 line super insightful posts ... FILTERED
Thats because QBT aren't a miner .... I dont hold with the idea that QBT SP is liked to bitcoin anyway ... not until they are actually commercially tied to a miner(s) with there software and the revenue is either a share of coin produced or license fees per mining machine. THEN there will be a direct correlation to Bitcoin or other coins
Bob why don't you have a good look at yourself in the mirror and just grow up
Seriously how old are you to act like this every day
Big shake and no takers
Both sides quoting 1 rig test .... if you are you know nothing about Bitty mining !!
the video (quite rightly) says you compare the results of 1 rig with QBT software and 1 without - THIS DOES NOT MEAN THEY ONLY TEST WITH 1 RIG !
they would need a miner prepared to live test with 1000 rigs or more (depending on hash rate of the rigs) .... that could only be one of the large north american miners.
BobS .... you can't take the assumed potential loss straight upto 7.6million in my example about Mara. clearly they would ramp the testing up as they see positive results so they aren't going to sit there for a whole month with 10000 rigs not mining anything !
BobsS .... difficult to follow your posts as usual, so much weird brain dump to read !
.... How many machines to use to live test and prove the software changes work? Mara have 180,000 machines, they mine 1800 BTC per month, thats 100 machines for 1 BTC .... so lets say they dedicate 1800 machines to the test a mere 1% of their fleet. in 1 month that would normally be 18 coin, with QBT lets say they see 30 coins (still well under the 2.6x) ... isnt that proof enough that the software changes work? Now what if the ramp it to 10% of their fleet for a month .... would we not suddenly see them have to RNS an unusual jump in their production? This is why I dont think miners doing the testing will be "testing" with many machines or for that long .... I think what is taking the time is agreeing a contract
You go with your "instincts" PartyPoop .. please dont hang around here though when there are lots of other people you can help with your incredible insights.
Ah hexam we both arrived at the same conclusion at the same time :D
On another note I wish MR £5000 seller/shorter would begger off today, they've killed the rise that had started
Will a month, 2 months, 3 ??? comes a point were its clearly not working ... should be obvious pretty quickly. I guess theres a volume of machines that the results should be clear but that doesnt become obvious to the market something dramatic has changed. Take Marathon they have about 180,000 machines and mine about 1800 coins per month, so they couldn't test on more than about 10% of their machines for longer than a month or it would become clear to the market that the mining results have changed for no reason.
How longs a piece of string .... we dont even know when this started SHOULD HAVE BEEN AN RNS.
I would have thought it would VERY obvious VERY quickly to a miner testing if the results suddenly showed x2.6 in coin mined .... its not like it should takes months ??