Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
over 66mill shares moved by 10am - IK, are you sure you're not pushing towards 2.99%?
still deep in the red, but too stubborn to trade at a loss (comfortable with PF holding and paper losses, and don't have the immediate need for the cash so will hold, hold, hold).
must have to buy XXXXXXXL pants, because that trading takes some big balls.
fair play.
.....which year?
asking for a friend.
seems that i cant type today:
"I thought it may be discontinued as its NOT on the Chill UK/USA website, but it still has the 'in stock' button lit up (ON THE LQ WEBSITE). Could be running stock down i guess.'
hope that reads better!
I thought it may be discontinued as its on on the Chill UK/USA website, but it still has the 'in stock' button lit up. Could be running stock down i guess.
Would have thought it would be a decent product line to try in the UK (rather than the chews).
Full disclosure, i'm not a smoker but can see where this market is heading and dont want to miss out!
was aware of the chill branded smokes, gummies and chews, but i don't remember seeing vape pens being mentioned, so thought i'd share this link to leafyquick.
https://leafyquick.com/products/chill-vape-cartridge-vanilla-200mg-5ml?pr_prod_strat=copurchase&pr_rec_pid=3689604055120&pr_ref_pid=4377962217552&pr_seq=uniform
bring it on.....lil' ol' me needs a replacement car (and mortgage paid off & holiday & something left over for beers).
not that worried about retractions, as they are to be expected. Read the scoping RNS and the TP update (and hope they issue a formal upgrade soon) and sit and wait!
Come on you shiny little penny…….
seems like on-one is asking above 1p for shares, so held in this mid- 0.9p range. Oh well, i'll take a week of rises over stagnant!
good volume passing through over this last week as well.
smug mode engaged - picked up 100k this morning to average down a little.
GLA
30MT at $40/tonne profit sounds ok to me??
To clear up a possible timing issue, I’m not suggesting sit on other assetsfor 8yrs running down the DSO supply! Hopefully should have the mine up & running in 6-9 months (sooner would be nice).
Focus must surely be on getting DSO onto ship. The scoping report suggested an 8yr mine (without the uplift for further resource confirmed), so keep the other projects ticking over with permits & licences up to date, but get the DSO out the ground, money coming in, then hit EH etc with the new cash flow. No need to raise cash if it all plays out.
PP,
Hopefully the BoD will want a happy AGM on Monday so will issue some decent updates in the couple of trading days - although probably not too juicy as that will lead to more questions and CB will run out of time!
Looks like the update is starting to bring in decent levels of buys - wonder if it’s the cash in the new bank to fund projects (with inevitable sp drop yo lower level) or update on mank that’s the driver.
Takes more than a couple of replies to offend me.
All I want is a balanced argument, with both sides being able to support views (and to make buckets of cash).
Personally think a lot of the vitriol here is due to missed deadlines from the company which leads people to start guestimating progress. This approach will always rub someone the wrong way.
Putting all that aside, blue day and a very small step towards those buckets of cash….
Bit of hypocrisy in this thread. Why all they replies and comments on ‘irrelevant nonsense’. If you want to shut someone out, just stop replying to them rather that do exactly the thing you are accusing them of.
Technically there was no berating in my first post. Also, it wasn’t the group, but rather the pointless pointscoreing tit-for-tat in the thread. So wrong on both fronts (maybe pedantic, but everyone seems to want facts these days…)
Think I’ve read enough to see that as soon as some people comment, the same copy and post replies are written up which bare no reference to the previous post, just shoot it down as ‘shortest’ ‘green wave’ or ‘ramping’.
I’m not here to sit in anyone’s camp, just want to read balanced arguments without name calling & trivial point scoring.
Will now retreat back to the shadows, as I don’t want to rock the boat.
All of this thread is pie-in-the-sky stuff, with everyone jumping at everyone else because no one has any proof of anything. It’s all very playground and lends nothing other than point scoring to this discussion board.