Member Info for inanaco

CD4+ T cells with cytotoxic activity (CD4 CTL) have been observed in various immune responses. These cells are characterized by their ability to secrete granzyme B and perforin and to kill the target cells in an MHC class II-restricted fashion. Although CD4 CTLs were once thought to be an in vitro artifact associated with long-term culturing, they have since been identified in vivo and shown to play important roles in antiviral and antitumor immunity, as well as in inflammation

They have not built the vaccine yet ... how can i answer ? the point of the post was pfizer is paying $120m just to build a single vaccine ...

they actually test it in human blood ... funny thing is, that is exactly how BioNtech builds its personal vaccine its has to identify Human T cells that go active against specific antigens ... then extract that particular TCR to transplant into a patients t cells and then clone them.

so yes Scancell has Human Cytotoxic CD4 T cells capable of eliciting a response to citrullinated peptides

I assume you understand that these are Natural t cells ... which have been proven to work

out of interest did you find that £50m paraty post ?

boom i cannot work out exactly what the capital invested in RD is to the 1p ... does it matter ? as the link presented showed development costs from $159m up ... with an average of $648m, so the relative amount of £25m is chicken feed in comparison ... or do you feel the odd £1m error makes any difference ?

£29m its is then...

no idea what you are posting ...

you can find many photos in the infra red of birds, obviously the red spectrum wavelength is recalibrated to visible light so that you can see the effect.

Boom losses carried its approx as we are in a new Financial year

Then you can appreciate just how far Scancell has gone on £25m capital invested

http://uk.businessinsider.com/drug-costs-to-develop-a-new-cancer-drug-2017-9?r=US&IR=T

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/how-fluvaccine-made.htm

but the point being its way more of a competitive landscape that what scancell is targeting the US market for a flu vaccine is about £3b .. but quite a bit of that is in cost of manufacture. how much is spent on oncology as a comparison ?

who is talking about a universal Flu vaccine ? Ivy, the idea behind using Mrna is you can manufacture faster and change the mutation strain that you are targeting quickly and cheaply

probably ... but then so few actually think how it all works ... and then settle on the fact that seeing things is normal ,, like alternative moditopes etc ...

a Bird is red , because in the absence of light reflected of it, the bird will only emit infrared light which appears only in the red spectrum the fact that the bird is black means you are not seeing a colour what you are looking at is the missing colours or darkness no light ...

suppose now we need a discussion as to what constitutes white ... those that watch Rainbow on TV maybe of assistance

any posters called Dulux ...

roses

Maxine and Jim Harwood of Piedmont, Ohio, June 1998. It was a recently fledged youngster. The Harwoods report seeing two white crows the next day, probably this one and a sibling.

same link ...

how do you go blind ?

http://www.birds.cornell.edu/crows/whitecrows.htm

Clearly google has the whitecrow problem sussed

like i said Ruck, you actually have not posted anything to discuss ....

however the search for the white crow continues ,....

I found a white Rook but that was on a chess board

If you have now determined there is risk ... and we follow guidelines why invest ? you could lose all your money.

Investing is not gambling if its done correctly so you start by weighting the risk, as you understand the science and understand how difficult it is to replicate that science because of the patents, the perception of risk from when you first look ie in my case 2012 to today is significantly different because I have concentrated on the key to scancells success which is the science.

Risk again is personal and that is purely down to how deep you look.

so nobody can determine the risk for any individual investor

but what you can say is "i think its risky" or "i dont think its risky"

in my case i see no risk but that is IMHO

The issue i have is those party's creating fake news to promote Risk ,....

you have made no point at all, other than to speculate that "another " moditope effective product exists

up to you if you wish to waste the time an effort to promote an alternative theory of risk

but to try and down play my posts by childish comments is indeed laughable ..