Member Info for Ilovesushi

With the way Reeves is destroying the economy and with open boarders and an influx of immigrants, Labour could be in a fix, disintegrate and fall apart really fast. Labour could be out within the year and the party splits. Reform already said they will turnaround a lot of Labours view on OIL.

UJO would be allowed to drill baby drill, then woosh.....We will be doing well in the USA and the UK...

STRONG BUY....

If PFC is anything to go by this is going to be shorted big time. Like PFC this will probably be forced to do a debt for equity swap.

Could fall much further and fall as much as PFC. Wood Group seems to have the same or similar issues that brought PFC down.

"The Sharing Agreement provides the opportunity for the Company to benefit from positive future share price

performance". Yes the company benefits when the company`s share price goes above 5.0 pence.

As the share price is falling the company does not benefit. Yet Lanstead appears to do quite well on share price falls. They did last time. And as we see Lanstead sells. When it sells it benefits more by the price drop. This was what caused the last drop to under 1.0 pence. Seems odd to me that there was a placing that was fully subscribed and Lanstead was not part of that placing but wanted a repeat of its last sharing agreement. This is where the company does not benefit and they do.

Why did IMM enter this same sharing agreement where the company is shafted. Why keep Lanstead in? It does create an automatic downward spiral. It did last time and it looks like history is repeating itself. If only Lanstead were not in for another sharing agreement. Its a bad deal for the company and we are out of pocket again.

Strong sell.

Not a holder or was I ever one. Been calling this lower for 10 years plus. I have seen off many a strong supporter of this company. Seen many coming and go and be wipes out. Yet some remain convinced and want to buy into the story of growth.

Watch-out for new contract wins. Demand the value of those wins. Now be very cautious in give more authority to the board. Do not vote for more Christ-masses.

The formula here is flawed it’s not a business or has it ever been one. This is a charity that will take all your money and offer little of anything at the end.

In a few months after they get new authorities the company will do more placings. 0.2 next time, that is if they are give. Such authority. Administration is on the cards here.

Ifs just a matter of days or weeks where the company announces a contract award. Often the shares may rise on such an announcement. God knows why as like all contracts won, none are profitable. Most contracts are for small amounts so small the company is so embarrassed to reveal the exact values of contract.

Fact is any contract announced, costs more to fulfils than what is made. Look at all past contracts won last year, they were too numerous to count. Yet all were non profitable.

Actually this company’s format is flawed. Its set up to win contracts and offer services that never bring in enough cash to where the company is profitable.

Looking at the realities here we see the company depending and reliant in, placings. The most disappointing thing of all is that without placings the company would cease to exist.

Lets conclude that it is most obvious now, is the company in its next AGM will ask shareholders for permission for more authority to issues more shares. And or (depending on several factors) the company may have to also get permission (from the courts) for a share reorganisation. The nominal share value needs tk be changed.

What does this point to? Is it not obvious? More shares are coming but not before share reorganisation.

Why give the company permission to issue, more shares that wipe you out? Why would Turkey’s vote for Christmas? Its ridiculous.

Why is it that there are some on these boards pushing this company as a buy but never warned Pi of the issue with this company and loss making contracts?

In the next EGM that has to come, Vote against the resolution to give authority to sell more shares or if required, permission for share reprganisarion.

These constant placings must end. Anyone buying here could lose the lot when the company realises it is the end of the road of constant placings. Send a signal that the shareholder will no longer support placings that wipe you out.

Oh last thing, ignore any new contract win. Any false rise is share price, you should get a good chance the chance to exit. Oh one more thing. Ignore this nonsense about growth from the board.

If you’re in the mood. When a contract is won, demand to know the value of the win.

Good luck all.

Why oh why did the board keep these people on board to work the system in their favour. Lanstead now have shares to sell and will have less to pay to the company than expected or wanted. Watch them take it lower to where they want it. Such a shame they are still here to trade it lower.

Clearly it was a mistake to do another deal with Landstead. The company knew the last sharing agreement undermines the company and the value of the shares. Now they enter another one. Lanstead selling took this to sub 1.0p why give them another opportunity to take it lower again?

Damn mistake getting into be again with these people. Already the company is getting less than planned in this sharing agreements.

Big mistake to keep Lanstead on the books. Never seen a sharing agreement work ever. Should have been a straight placing. These people have arranged this sharing agreement as it suites them best. They will now take it lower. That is what they do best. And benefit from.

Going up for sone reason

Something happening

Why pay £75k to extend warrants that are purchased at 9.5 pence. When you could have bought them for about 5.0 pence?

At the moment those warrants are out of the money and actually have no value. Value only appears if Incanthara solves its patents in their favour and the share price goes up up to 20 pence.

Better buying Incanthara to get most of the upside.

Looks like the Lanstead is doing its magic again. It seems to do really well to get that price down. The lower it goes the more it benefits.

I thought the company saw the damage that Lanstead did to the share value. Surprising they allowed them to stay to do their manipulating of the price. Surely Lanstead will continue to sell until the next placing replacing what it has sold at a lower price, then benefiting from the lower price. Why did IMM not see this happening. Its history repeating itself.

I see no participation in the funding by directors. That is telling. Obvious why they are not buying in. No doubt they know that at some time in June and July they will need more cash. And they cannot issues more shares at less than 0.40 without doing either a share consolidation or share reorganisation. That the directors do not buy, is a good pointer. Perhaps people should follow their lead and not buy?

That the directors do not buy one has to ask why would they? If prospects were good they would not hesitate. These people know full well not to buy as they know this company is based on and reliant in fundraises and heavily discounted placings. With many more to come. Now they will be forced with the share price collapse to change the nominal value of the shares then cancel some.

Certainly explains why the directors have not bought in here for some time.

If the Patent dispute in Incanthara continues past 31 March, IMM may very well wipe off any value in its warrants. With shares at 5.0 pence how can warrents to buy at 9.5 be worth anything.

Those warrants now worthless and carry no value.

AT least Tim did sell the last remaining holding in INC at a good time and the company only held Warrants. Clear now those warrants have zero value. Should he pay good money to extend past March 31? Why pay for warrants that gives right to buy at 9.0 pence when they can be bought for 5.0p?

Paying for an extension to those warrants was a waste of money.

A cash consideration of £75,000 for extension to warrants to 31 March 2025?

Looks like they will need another £75,00 0 to extend again. Then pay 9.5 pence a share? Its possible that that holding is now not worth anything. All valued destroyed? Need that dispute to be solve with Patents.

Obviously Tim knows full well those warrants rights are soon dissolved and he need to pay again. That money to extend is going to cost more and more. Then who would be shares at 9.5 pence the warrant price when you can buy for 5.pence in the market. Looks like the value once held in Incanthara are now WORTHLESS ANYONE. Incanthara has to go up 100% before there is any value at all. Then why not buy at 5.0pence why the hell pay money to extend warrents that gives you a right to buy at 9.0P?

Warrants are now out of pocket.

Actually Tim has made a big mistake. He paid most of the last cash the company had (£691,000 or there abouts) to extend warrants. He did not want to sell the shares at 15 - 20 Pence level as the thought they were worth more. So he paid money to extend the rights. Hopefully when the price is higher. Then the shares crashed to around the 5 pence level. A big booboo. Could have sold shares in Incanthara at a higher price and not spent anything on extending those options the company had on the warrants. Of course Tim did not know then the shares of Incathara would literally collapse. What bad timing. They could have sold all their Incanthara holding at 20 pence or more. Now the have an asset in INC.pl that value has fallen through the flaw. The value of the holding in INC is probably not worth much more now that what he paid for the extension of the warrants. Rotten timing.

Laura2022. I do not think you are riddler or seawolf. But your posts seem very very familiar. When this poster disappeared you appeared at the same time. I cannot remember the moniker you used. If I remember correctly you used to like. Proton Motor PPS. Maybe Goldplat and a few others. I think several of the shares you promoted vanished. Your user name will come back to me in a while. You used to have a small following and post to a select few privately. I will remember some of the names of those who would buy into the same shares you tipped. It will come to me in a minute.

On the 6/12/2024 Lanstead sold about 15 million shares ( or there about ) approximately 3% of the company. Now did it know there were to be a share placing in February? Seems to me This Lanstead group seems to benefit by share price falls.

Now we are told it is beneficial to the company if the share price performance increases by this new profit share agreement if the Share Price goes ABOVE 5.0P

What this means is it is NOT beneficial for the company if the price falls right? And this fall benefits Lanstead right? It certainly seems to have helped Lanstead getting lower prices. Is it possible that some of these shares that are issued were pre sold at higher prices allowing Lanstead to buy back cheaper? I hate these sharing agreements. They never seem to benefit the company.

I am certain that Lanstead knew a placing was coming and sold 3% of the company knowing full well a placing was coming. Would have been better had IMM got another company in other than Lanstead. The last profit sharing agreement caused a huge share price crash and destroyed a lot of value.

They should have got rid of Lanstead. Having them hanging around can only force the price lower. Never seen a profit sharing agreement work. Always send the price lower. Those who have one seem to benefit by a falling price. And the company is always shafted never getting what it had in the agreement. Already IMM is getting less than what it would like as the company shares fall. Where is the profit share in that? It is never obtained. Yet I think Lanstead is now in the money on that fall already. Better they had gone. It can only keep falling now as they sell at lower and lower prices. Damn.

There was definite forward selling here. Its supposed to be illegally. Technically that is illegal but fact is it gets the green flag from those that police the market. It was taken up not long ago for the precise reason. When shares go up, it is time to be aware that a placing is being worked. The Market Maker must be in on it. Then take a cut. The deal is announced AFTER they complete their sales.

Now they actually are issued shares they already sold. Shocking how they get away with it time and time again. It would not surprise me they start selling more shares as soon as, to fit in with their future support of a placing.

No wonder less and less people want to be involved or trade in AIM

I suggest just 2 weeks ago there would be a placing at 0.5. What did I get for it? I was attacked then trolled on other boards where I held.

Shocking.