Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
im not sure I agree with your time scales Seasick. Think we could have major news this month, but I do tend to agree this is a shorters dream, and get bored sh1(less with comments about shorts burning or similar.
i would recommend any unresearched or new investor to print off RNS's from about 3yrs ago to current date (only the relevant ones) read them in one go if you have the time, highlight the important bits and then laugh at idiots like Millenialinvestr with the rest of us.
Bacebook and Parttimer can agree with quite a lot of what you both say. Sometimes though its a lot harder to provide evidence this side of the fence when your viewpoint opposes the official narrative, as alternative viewpoints are censored and 'fact checked' out of existence before they have the time to gain traction.
Parttimer we have to agree to disagree. This is a false flag in my opinion. Many of your points you preface with 'I believe' , so they're your opinions. My opinion is Putin doesn't want to go to war and is putting on a show of strength to protect his interests. NATO likewise are don't want to look like they're backing down. Biden has suggested Russia can invade Ukraine, but not go in hard, the Ukrainian Foreign office have stated the Russian troops have been there since April with no issues, and Macron is suggesting this will be dealt with by diplomacy. Its posturing from both sides and ultimately it should play out with both sides going back to their people claiming a 'moral ' victory unless one party goes off script looking for a popularity boost.
Bacefook is Putin really the aggressor though? The old soviet Union was broken up on the understanding Russia would have a buffer to NATO nations, yet here we are with NATO trying to bring Ukraine into the fold and box Russia in. So Russia amass some troops which the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry tell us have been peacefully close to their border since April without any indication of escalation. Can you imagine if the roles were reversed and somehow USA were in Russia's position. We would already be at war..... and let's say Russia were to invade. NATO/ the Americans literally invade a new country every couple of years under 'regime change' and hows that worked out for the people of those countries? Is anyone kicking up a fuss over USA/ Saudi invading Yemen? Oh, thats right, our media propaganda machine don't want you to know about that one. When people start to realise NATO aren't necessarily the good guys is the day we start moving to a more peaceful world. Ukraine is a false flag, start looking for whats really going in the world rather that having your attention diverted away.
Ok, I stand corrected. Just hoping there isnt a mass sell off after the 4 months are up crashing the SP.
personally Oriens1, a 500k purchase doesnt necessarily mean anything. Hopefully someone is in the know, but I have earmarked big investments into other stocks once EUA comes in. This could just be someone that has had a return on their investment elsewhere, has researched stocks to invest and has chosen EUA. they may be just as in the know as any one of us.
Layla1, I'd disagree that its the traders that are getting angsty waiting. Many on here are that convinced by the prospects for Eua/2 have gone all in here, and a lot of that confidence is based on the communication from the BoD. Their choice of wording has been poor and has raised expectations of a quick deal. How many of us were getting up for that 7am RNS from late 2020. Thats 18 months this deal has been on the cards to land. Yes, there's been Covid, licence and all other sorts of delays, but its times like these that more thought should have been given to the wording and clarity from the BoD. Even more so with whats going on politically and in the stockmarkets worldwide.
Many are
it was a pre IPO @ discounted 4p/share, but with a 3 month lock in so as not to crash the SP on listing.
Gecko, I have a lot of sympathy for your views. In my opinion had the company communicated their information better there wouldnt be so much 'anxiety' (for want of a better word) amongst what obviously appears to be a sizeable proportion of the shareholder base. Thats not to say these shareholders arent fully supportive of the BoD and what theyre doing, just that those below this level should be doing a much better job of wording and communicating this information to shareholders.
Dealer 55, I 100% thought I'd prefer the Trump era, but then, I made my decisions on his policies and how they brought many Americans out of poverty and made the country energy efficient to name but two. He had easily the largest percentage vote from Black and Hispanic Americans of any Republican ever, yet the main stream media continually tried to paint him as ra... cist because he tried to contain mass immigration at his borders.
del929, there's lots of criticism of investors by other investors for getting angsty with the time this is taking to get over the line. I'm my opinion the company itself is hugely responsible when you consider the language they've used as you so rightly point out - shortly ...131 days and counting, advanced stages .....154 days and counting. We can all agree the BoD appear to be playing a blinder, especially in everything we know in terms of value creation and recently communication. However, as far as the ongoing negotiations we don't know and language in some RNS's I would say not.