I WOULD argue theyre not bothered. Theyve got history with the word 'shortly', have used it numerous times, its been debated to death everytime they use it yet they continue to use it. It doesn't take a genius or someone with an extraordinary vocabulary to construct a sentence that won't escalate expectations which can then turn to frustration for a proportion of holders.
I'd also suggest that just this one word has had a lot to do with SP instability and made this a dream share for traders.
Would love this to be true, but who is doing the talking? He doesn't reference a source, or even allude to one. However, he is someone that's earnt a level of respect, so I'm not ruling it out, but a bit too cryptic for me to get too excited.
Another RNS that makes EUA even more compelling, but will people shut up about shorts burning rhetoric. Its been the same for years, and the shorters have had free ride after free ride. The only time they'll get properly burned is if the board pull the rug out from under them with a massive RNS.
....and for everyone responding to the derampers and complaining how they're ruining debate, its you thats feeding them and creating the exact conditions they want. Ignore and block and you get decent debate. Engage and you get what you deserve, but not what the rest of us that ignore deserve. Cut off their oxygen and they die.
UFO on my watch/buy list. Just catching up here, talk of metal detectors, hole drilling............
I'd advocate an aboriginal/native American Indian, Inca or any indigenous person with a pair of divining rods do the prospecting.
I'm not a holder anymore, so no skin in the game, but if anyone is stupid enough to believe Candi's deramping they deserve to lose their money on this. Does ANYONE believe Candi has inside knowledge on Monecor insider dealing information about CLON are out of any Bolivia deals. C'mon people, Candi a keyboard warrior on some dead bulletin board with insider knowledge on Clon's bolivia deal, and insider knowledge on Monecor's underhand disposal of shares plan. Thats one very clued up investor you have on this board. You are so lucky they've stopped off here to let you know whats going on. If only I could post emoji on here there'd be a page full of laughy crying ones.
Not invested here, and not done any notable research on the company, but it is on my shortlist of stocks to review from when the buzz was massive on Syme. Just looked at the mcap of £80 odd million though and was a little surprised. I thought it would be way south on that. That said, not done any real research so could be worth multiples of where it is now, and anyone currently in surely can't sell at these prices, because risk to reward must be heavily weighted in reward at these levels.
As I said, not invested, but LSE is a cesspit of scumbags trying to manipulate you one way or the other. If you are an inexperienced investor here,filter out the noise and follow those researched posters that have a forensic knowledge of the stock. Watch anything you can on you tube by the company and use the company RNS's as your guide not some chav on the other end of a computer screen that would virtually happily rob you blind
Philistine. You don't know Bez? He's the nutty dancer from Happy Mondays that cheated on bargain hunt and was found out.
Pdub, I will agree, there were many well researched posters on LSE, at the time I believed it to be the best researched board there was, and I've also largely left lse for the same reasons and spend much of my time on an equally well researched EUA forum to get away from those that benefit from doing a share damage. I'm not here to deramp, subtley deramp ..............or purposely get anybodys back up, unless of course shots are fired in my direction first and then I'll happily trade blows. However, well researched as the LSE BMN board was, and to be fair it was forensic at times, genuine inexperienced posters without any axe to grind or alterior motive were often shot down whilst making genuine albeit maybe naive questions. It was often a fire first, ask questions later approach and it was generally done as a group. I'm not saying there weren't scrotes that deserved to be shot down from all angles, but there was quite a lot of collateral damage too. To me, the term 'old guard' isn't derogatory. I will argue quite a few of them came across as miserable so and so's and in real life I would probably have found certain members too arrogant by far to have wanted to ever have a conversation with, but they had courage in their convictions and defended the share to the hilt. I just feel that many of them (yourself, Rich Ken, possibly BBN accepted, don't recall them all) would have ended up with numerous black eyes and bloodied noses if they spoke to people in person the way the did online. That 'old guard' as well as some of the more reasonable posters will have lost a lot of people a lot of money not allowing the broaching of any questioning that would consider the potential for a SP downturn. Now you'll probably say they should have done their own research, and you'd be right, but when there was hours and hours of daily research and fast paced discussion going on almost 24/7 its pretty hard to get off that fast moving train.
Before you think I've got an axe to grind, I managed to get off the train in the highest twenties and went all into EUA with my BMN funds mostly around 2.6p, so have 10 bagged from here, so as I've said, no axe to grind, and think the current SP should it hold is an entry point I will gladly spread some of my SIPP returns into.
I'm probably rambling, and missed the point I wanted to make, but I think the 'old guard' with their arrogance, bad attitude and inability to consider there may be trouble ahead actually created the monster this board became because by the look of it huge numbers of posters just joined in to bait and frustrate them. As I said, its a shame they took all 'non party line questioning' as negative and they caused their own problems with their lack of humility.
Haha. Honestly not purposely being provocative. I wish I had charting skills, so I am definitely not him. BMN is a stock I've held and intend on returning to in the not too distant future. However, when I first invested in late 2018/19 ish as a very naive investor who had done their research and discovered a very well run business, I did get pulled along by the outlandish predictions of where the SP would end up in the short, medium and full term, and was so convinced by certain posters that i never thought there was any chance of the SP dropping below 10p. Like a fool, I piled in even in the high 40's posting on here and getting the proverbial backslap and that'll look cheap in a month, by the end of the year, blah, blah.
I'm not here to deramp or cause friction, I still think the company has a great future, but one thing I will say is the reaction to me even mentioning Chartist just goes to show whilst many of 'the old guard' have left( why would you have a problem with me using this phrase?... ) those that remain are entrenched and refuse to be think outside their comfort bubble. It a shame really people get so confrontational over nothing these days. Can't be good for your health.
Was invested here a while ago, selling up to go big into EUA pre suspension. Wasn't expecting the ride I've had at EUA and thought the deal would have happened by now and I would be piling some sizeable profit back here and hopefully put myself in the position of having a decent free carry in the not too distant future. I think those moves aren't far off happening, and what I'm about to say will probably met with some derision, but I do miss Chartist2. He actually called it spot on more often than not despite many of the old guard not giving him the time of day because a dissenting view on a rising SP was at best frowned upon. Wonder where he's posting now?
In fact not just gold, but all precious and essential metals for greener industries/ big infrastructure. I'm big in Eurasia Mining, almost 90% big- (Palladium, platinum, rhodium etc), but also looking to diversify into copper, silver, rare earth metals, uranium when hopefully their asset sale goes through and dividend drops.
Agree with Sector Inspector. Will be a bull run on gold juniors, gold in general. Check out Mark Moss, Stansbury Research and Kitco news on you tube. They break down (especially Mark Moss) how fiat currencies in printing more notes are creating a situation where there's more notes for the same amount of goods, services and assets available to buy thus creating inflation. People in the know then put their devaluing cash into real assets with value including gold, and the gold price rises up. Gold miners from early stage to big producers then get better returns - costs of extraction vs price per ounce sold. This even makes previously unprofitable reserves worth mining again.
Tùuuuuuuuuuuuune, from the greatest album ever.
Sold out of Tils at about £1 to go almost all in to EUA expecting it have sold by now. Haven't kept up to date with whats been going on here, but saw todays drop and thought I'd take a look. Surprised its currently at these levels and possibly going lower from its highs of about a year ago.
Do you mean delete all the asterisks? Tried it and doesn't work?
Thanks for the link. Just confirming what I thought because this site says 6m