RE: Compare and contrast27 Mar 2022 08:45
UKOG say what they want. It is not necessarily true imo. Take Basur for instance.
What UKOG said in RNS's.
"The Basur discovery, made in 1964, whose primary target was the shallow Cretaceous age Garzan reefal limestones, recovered 600 bbl of oil to surface from deeper naturally-fractured and dolomitised Cretaceous Mardin limestones. Core and cuttings contained live oil. Of the oil to surface, 500 bbl were produced over a 6-hour test period, equating to an extrapolated rate of 2,000 barrels of oil per day ("bopd")."
"Basur-1 flowed 500 bbl to surface over a 6-hour period from naturally fractured and dolomitised Cretaceous age Mardin limestones, an extrapolated rate equivalent to 2,000 bbl of oil per day. "
"As previously reported on 14 October 2020, 15 January 2021, 21 June 2021, Basur-1 flowed oil to surface at encouraging rates over a 6-hour test period."
What the Turkish Oil Authority at the time said in 1965 Petrol Faaliyeti Petrol Dairesl Nesrlyati No. 10.
"In addition, although 44 tons of 35 API crude oil was obtained in the tests carried out in Basur-1 well, the tests were terminated because salt water came later."
What UKOG don't tell you is that the licence was surrendered by a major Turkish O&G company after a final drilling in 2014. The well was classified as a "water well". It didn't even get reported as a P&A.