Member Info for Ibug

Problem with these delayed notifications is they sometimes don't last log do they ocelot? Care to explain why you keep trying to pull the wool over others eyes?

27-Mar-25 10:51:26 0.011 -116,696,080 Unknown* 0.0105 0.011 -12.84k

None of the outstanding planning "Conditions" have been applied for for nearly 2 years now. Be interesting to see what is said about it next week.

Shame ocelot didn't read this first rather than relying on DoD to do his dirty work.

https://mycouncil.surreycc.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=42088

Lse is not responsible for updating the website. No. of shares in issue is incorrect and mozzarella is still down as a shareholder even though he is no longer a director. Not exactly rocket science to work out what is real and what is not, a bit like the tweets that come out.

Ocelot missed out the relevant bits.

"The council said the most recent visit had been on 20 March 2024 to inspect decommissioning work that took place on 13 March 2025.

A pump had been removed and officials observed “continuing efforts to remove operational development associated with production activity”, the council said.

It added that officials would continue to inspect the Horse Hill site to ensure progress continued “at a satisfactory pace”."

Ocelot

Why should they tell us when they haven't told SCC what is going on in over 3 months since the Regulation 25 Request letter was sent out? You really do live in your own dream world.

Part 2

3. Jackie Macey asked the following supplementary question:

I’m pleased to hear your assurance that drilling has finally ceased at Horse

Hill. In your reply, you state that you've asked for UKOG’s programme to

complete the removal of equipment from the site. Has this now been shared

with the Council? Also, has it been possible to ascertain how much oil

production is typically involved when minimum maintenance flow is required?

As I understand it, 1/3 of the usual monthly production was produced in 15

days on the site, which doesn’t appear to be very minimal.

In response, the Planning Development Manager stated that, in relation to the

'minimum maintenance load’, the issue had been examined during the period

of the relevant flow. However, further exploration would be required to fully

address the question as the situation had resolved itself once the period

ended. The matter would be revisited to determine if a more detailed

response could be provided. Regarding the final programme of works from

UKOG, the Planning Development Manager confirmed that no final

programme had been received at that time. Discussions were ongoing, and

efforts were being made to understand the timeframes UKOG was working to.

Once these were clarified, they would inform the next steps.

4. Aet Annist did not ask a supplementary question.

5. Sarah Freeman asked the following supplementary question

In response to my public question about monitoring visits to the Horse Hill

site, we were reassured that there had been a recent visit on 4 February

2025. I would like to know if any of those inspecting the site were told when

the site would be fully cleared of the unlawful development. Is there a final

date that UKOG have agreed to fully vacate the site?

In response, the Planning Development Manager stated that no final date had

been agreed for the removal of equipment from the site. Discussions had

taken place during the site visit, but the applicant had not provided a definitive

timeline. Monitoring officers had made it clear that there was still an expectation

for the equipment to be cleared.

Five public questions were submitted. The questions and responses were

published within a supplementary agenda on 25 February 2025.

1. Deborah Elliott asked the following supplementary question:

In response to my question, you implied that the original planning application

at Horse Hill had been returned to Surrey County Council to reevaluate and

give a new decision. As the Supreme Court ruled the planning permission

granted was illegal, what amendments have UK Oil and Gas (UKOG) made,

or Surrey County Council asked for, to make the application comply with the

Supreme Court ruling?

In response, the Planning Development Manager explained that the Supreme

Court’s quashing of the application meant the decision was invalid, and the

application had been returned for reconsideration. A Regulation 25 letter had

been sent to the applicant outlining the necessary revisions to the

environmental statement, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision and

updated guidance. The authority had not yet received a formal response from

the applicant, and confirmation had been sought from the applicant’s agent

regarding the submission timeline.

2. Jacqueline Phillips asked the following supplementary question

The public questioner stated that they had looked for the application on the

website but could not find it. They asked where the application could be found

and where the letter, which had been mentioned earlier, could be located.

In response, the Planning Development Manager confirmed that the

information could be located within the online planning register on the Surrey

County Council website. Further to this, the Planning Development Manager

confirmed that the Regulation 25 letter was sent on 18 December 2024.

"Plans to build the UK’s biggest hydrogen production plant near Kintore have been dealt a blow after councillors pushed for it to be axed."

https://www.aberdeenlive.news/news/aberdeen-news/plans-building-uks-biggest-hydrogen-10054740

Worth keeping an eye on.

Ocelot

1. It is not a report it is a PPT.

2. "Quod report shows how UKEn’s proposed South Dorset hydrogen storage project is the sole project capable of delivering the largest hydrogen demand from 2040. Find out more here."

2040! What happened to 2030 and 2035?

Where is the money in an underground warehouse?

Ever been had?

StockCheque

Have you seen what EWE are worth? UKOG can hardly raise enough money to stay afloat so what chance do they have of joining the big boys? None.

Heavy buying again this morning. Must be going for some kind of record.

25-Mar-25 09:00:07 0.011 350,000 Buy* 0.011 0.011 38.50 O

25-Mar-25 08:58:36 0.011 154,545 Buy* 0.011 0.011 17.00 O

25-Mar-25 08:50:45 0.011 500,000 Buy* 0.0105 0.011 55.00 O

25-Mar-25 08:01:44 0.011 345,909 Buy* 0.0105 0.011 38.05 O

HH didn't even get a mention in ASIAN BATTERY METALS PLC last accounts.

From last years report:

UKOG’s net share of Horndean production revenues was £297,000 for calendar year 2023, with net earnings after costs of £140,000.

REVENUE 1,538,000

Depletion, Depreciation and Amortisation (244,000)

Other Cost of Sales (1,019,000)

Gross profit 275,000

7. Directors and employees

The Company employed the services of an average of 14 employees in the year (2022: 14). Remuneration in respect of these employees was:

Group 2023 £'000 2022 £'000

Employment costs, including Directors, during the year:

Wages and salaries 1,799 1,628

Social security costs 233 216

Employee pension costs 13 13

Benefits in kind 15 10

Total 2,060 1,867

At 30 September 2023, the outstanding loan balances owed to HHDL’s shareholders were; Alba Mineral Resources PLC (Alba) £2.1 million (2022: £2.54 million), Doriemus PLC (Doremius) £0.6 million (2022: £0.57 million) and UK Oil & Gas Plc £17.43 million (2022: £16.59 million). The loans are payable on determination by the Board of HHDL. The loans currently attract an interest rate equivalent to the Bank of England base rate.

19. Provisions - decommissioning

Group 2023 £’000

As at 1 October 1,442,000

Change of estimate (119,000)

Unwind discount 128,000

As at 30 September 1,451,000

imo decommissioning costs are going to be a lot more. Or they should be. HH1, HH2, HH2Z, BB1, BB2, BB2Z

GD1962

You do realise HH was still partially producing in September 2024 and Hornrndean had a workover but we don't know on what dates and which wells.

HORNDEAN September 15/09/2024 592.263

HORNDEAN October 15/10/2024 805.511

HORNDEAN November 15/11/2024 677.229

HORNDEAN December 15/12/2024 753.865

The last 4 months figures don't give us a real clue for Horndean.

HORSE HILL LAND September 15/09/2024 112.518

HORSE HILL LAND October 15/10/2024 107.442

HORSE HILL LAND November 15/11/2024 54.99

HORSE HILL LAND December 15/12/2024 0

Oops I missed the 1 out

Should have been 0.0102 p

It was probably all the PI's that bought into the last "Funding" not being able to offload their shares at a profit. Must be over 70% stuck in PI's hands or selling at a loss. I haven't seen any sells at over 0.02p. Or have they selling short?

""Tom Winnifrith Bearcast: More Poulden & Lenigas high jinks and have we missed the boat on £830m Alphawave as a short?

By Tom Winnifrith

I answer the question is UK PLC a short worthy of bearcast? Then the latest farce at Wishbone Gold (WSBN). ""

Https://postimg.cc/gallery/mgVc0M2

PS Aladdin still drilling for oil in Basur/Resan licence east of Pinarova.

Are being emptied

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareTrades.html?shareprice=UKOG&share=UK-Oil--Gas

Makingitupagain

Takes one to know one. Yet another delayed trade. You still haven't worked it out have you?

Https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareTrades.html?shareprice=UKOG&share=UK-Oil--Gas

Seller is really extracting the Michael today.