RE: Surprised at the lack of23 Jun 2023 22:12
Jim
637 proven gas, + maybe 735 , = 1372 not 1392, + maybe 280, gives 1672 - which is >1.6t . but isn't that a "maybe " rather than a "clear " pathway? Whatever, they are big numbers whichever way you count them.
Reading your previous posts tells me you have done your numbers and are quite expert in your theories. I know nothing about gas exploration and rely on instinct from what I read. What do I believe, and what could be an exaggeration or a big hope. On this one I'm excited and the caution being exercised is due to market makers keeping the price low to pick up stock that PIs are selling out of impatience but making a nice profit anyway. PIs like you and me and most on here have enough and probably most PIs are not on here or other chat rooms but simply read Simon Thompson Marcy and stick some with all their others and keep their fingers crossed. The MMs probably have their pockets nearly full by now and when the SP moves it may move a lot in a sort of stampede.
The value is there and if APs gang cannot sort it out they can find a buyer who can.
I agree with your last 3 words.
Ian