Member Info for Ian_

Well, LSE shows 2 trades 'Red Dots' but if one looks at the actual trades showing there is nothing for today.
If we look at the Eurasia Mining site it shows 2 Buys for today at 14:53, as posted, with no reference value, but for a price of 7.54p,

Who knows, but something is stirring again.

Good luck.

Yes, Sturfc54, that is an interesting observation,
TIMESTAMP VOLUME PRICE PREVIOUS BID PREVIOUS OFFER VALUE DIRECTION
04/05/20 14:53 1,500,000 7.54 0.00 0.00 £113,124.00 Buy
04/05/20 14:53 1,500,000 7.54 0.00 0.00 £113,124.00 Buy

Ther is no previous bid and the buy notation could be wrong if computer-generated because of no reference, but it is for a price that is higher than 7.20, does anyone think it could be an off-book purchase if at all allowable, getting exciting again.

Morning Tricky, as again it is with what context the word is used, as I say it was a very innocent word until the politically correct got involved and twisted its true meaning-

Extract from Wikipedia and their copyright-

The golliwog, golliwogg or golly is a fictional character created by Florence Kate Upton that appears in children's books in the late 19th century and usually depicted as a type of rag doll. It was reproduced, both by commercial and hobby toy-makers, as a children's toy called the "golliwog", a portmanteau of golly and polliwog,[1][2][3] and had great popularity in the UK and Australia into the 1970s. The doll is characterised by black skin, eyes rimmed in white, red lips and frizzy hair. Though home-made golliwogs were sometimes female, the golliwog was generally male. For this reason, in the period following World War II, the golliwog was seen, along with the teddy bear, as a suitable soft toy for a young boy.

In later years the image of the doll has become the subject of controversy. While some people see the doll as a symbol of childhood and an innocuous toy.

Thanks, Gazlad, very kind of you, I just want us all to do well out of this and to all the positive investors amongst us who have enjoyed a good old banter and bot-fly bashing tennis game, a great return on their investment, why wouldn't I, we are all in the same boat....sorry Capt'n Tilley....ship.
Kind regards
Ian

As kids in the sixties, we all used to call each other that sort of thing, it was only as recently as 1994 that the society changed its name from that to Scope, it is hard nowadays to not offend as such words were commonplace, I used to collect the little black dolls from the back of Robertson's jam, they were what they were, just little black dolls, now that word is wrong...

Thank you Tonwin, fully up to speed now, all the best.

Was the word that was used, use to be collected for by the society back in the day by a collection box depicting a young girl in calipers with her dog perchance?

Oh, what our Ryan did that, how odd, thanks for the reply,

Good morning Sturfc, I missed the post but caught your reply, "Shocker of a comment RR" may I ask what the RR stood for?

Today's entrants are:-

----------
Wybster - 04/05/20 08:45 am
Saxonaxe - 04/05/20
Watson003 - 04/05/20
Bill - 04/05/20
Giles1976 - 04/05/20
----------

Good luck everyone on this Star Wars Day 2020.

Jarsog, Iamtree has been cut down, chopped up, pulverized, and mulched, and turned into paper for the pages of his new 'bestceller'....

The name of his new avatar that appeared and has now been removed

Hi, Mannamead, sorry I have no idea, I have only glanced at COBR to view his posting/ramping style and then one look at his profile and I gleaned all that I required 93 posts now in 24 hours, says all I need to know, watch the stock price rise from the off (due to his ramping) then watch it fall back is my view, if you are invested and want to get out it may give you a window of opportunity to do so, if you have done your research and are happy with your investment decision then you're ok.
I wish you well and all the best.
Ian

Ouch, sorry to hear that Pete, I have in the past knelt on a screw so total understand, not nice, as boredom has set in and I started to tidy up I came across my old chessboard and Becky said can you teach me how to play, so I am trying, but it is difficult to keep on ignoring the moves I should take so that the game will last for longer than 15 minutes, strangely I still keep on winning ...:-) take care sir.
All the best
Ian

Just another reminder LL, that 'TOPI' poster who joined LSE yesterday and has got your interest, has so far ramped and posted 92 times ....in 24 hours, 62 times on COBR and 31 times on VAL, that is not a normal investor, much more like a pump and dump character, tread with extreme caution as I advised yesterday, you seem to be so worried about this stock when you should be in fact very worried about COBR, again, your money your choice.....

Anyone think we are just going around in circles here.... :-)
Hi Pete , yes well thanks, just need new glasses whenever the opticians open's again, I hope you are keeping well.
Afternoon Nick, yes I agree with you on that part too, All the best mate.

LL, just a point, even if the company did not distribute a special dividend and reinvested the money straight back into the company, the company coffers would go up, and consequently, the stock price ie company value/shares in issue would equal a corresponding share price rise, so a win-win either way and not a problem for anyone who is actually invested here.

LL, the first option would I expect be every investor preferred option, I certainly wish to remain invested in this company, and if it was to issue a yearly dividend so much the better, who would not like to have shares in a yearly divided providing company going forward, I know I would.

LL, you know perfectly well that at the moment I'm perfectly happy with the current situation, the current NOMAD was staying on to hand over to the new one and things are just taking longer than expected that is all, as I have stated we still have plenty of time on our hands and a long way off from the final curtain call, have some faith in the management, I do, and that is why I invested such a large amount in this company.

Hi LL, you are correct with this, "The BoD don't have to pay a special dividend at all! " which has been discussed at length, one camp would like the money directly re-invested directly back into the company to allow it to grow as fast as possible and perhaps then pay the investor's an annual dividend going forward, the other camp, referring to the video interview/discussion where DS stated he wanted to repay long term investors for their loyalty and award everyone with a special dividend. we will have to wait and see what transpiers.

The board of directors cannot just allocate / give away cash that belongs to one company to another, anything along those lines that are material to the company would have to go through shareholder approval and be voted on by all shareholders.
You do seem to be trying to find a fault with this company? we, at the moment, are still suspended and missing a vital NOMAD at the moment, one thing at a time. let's see how this plays out, if we don't sell something, we won't have any money to distribute among the shareholders so a moot point at the mo. just relax and wait and see.