Member Info for Ian_

Yes you can, all done, good luck

Hi Dafad, you are aware that the 14 is this Sunday?

Added to the list is Dafad - 14/06/20, good luck

Hi Hallister, no I was in total agreement with your post as you know, just so annoying that some just spin things into the negative where there is nothing to be negative about, and you know exactly who I mean..
All the best and did not mean any offense as you know.

Afternoon Hallster, exactly, the cut off date for filing results is the end of this month, the company will not do anything that would annoy the AIM regulators and fall foul, it is not rocket science to know that they would be releasing news for that just reason EOY results within approx two weeks, if someone was to contact the company and the company said you should hear something by the end of the month, that is not inside information that is just stating a common-sense fact, does not say anything on what the info may contain does it. Just the usual spin on facts, by the un-invested looker in...

Added to the list is Cebo-456 - 24/06/20, good luck

Added to the list is Newtonheath4612 - 17/06/20, good luck

Added to the list is Brotherjoey for 25/06/20, good luck mate

Afternoon JTMacs,
Yes, as has been bandied about this morning the word from the company is we should all hear something within the next fortnight, which would tie-in with EOY results.

A1ex has been using his detective prowess to research the Rusian records for the Tipil flanks license and has found it has progressed to the final stage of the license being signed off. (or words to that effect)

A1ex has been going further and found a way to use and access some satellite imagery and has seen that work has been carried out on-site at WK for some time and other bits of a very positive nature.

Mac, and Gmf78, have done some exhaustive calculating on what we could be worth under various scenarios.

Still back to the waiting at the mo, all still looking very good for us as investors though :-)

To be honest one of them can fill you in with much more detail as I'm just awaiting that next juicy RNS for confirmation.

All the best and good luck
Ian

Good to know, thanks for your update, all the best.

Morning Hallster, yes I do believe you are right, sometime this month would make perfect sense. :-)

And LeftHandGolfer you are already down for this month so all the best with your special date. :-)

And LHG you are verboten from entering the guess the next RNS date for the next 2 weeks... :-)

Without any bias let me assume to help LHG out of a hole that he may be surmising that the EOY company results are due soon and put two and two together, sounds plausible...

LeftHandGolfer, get out of that one.. Haha.. :-)

NNS1966, just looked up the item on Aldi, link to it, https://www.aldi.co.uk/toro-loco-superior/p/040728020610200 unfortunately according to the link no longer available to order :-(

Hi NMS1966, if I may, the wine was Toro Loco Tinto Superior @ about £3.50 ago, apparently.

Hi A1ex, yes I did see your kind post but it was in amongst the others.. are you R1ex over there?

Morning Mannamead, yes exactly, still the BBC is its own worst enemy some times and very biased in its views.

Good luck with your guess for today :-)

Today's entrants are:-

----------
Moneygecko - 12/06/20
MarkA8178 - 12/06/20
Mannamead1711 - 12/06/20
----------

Good luck all

I see the BBC is thinking of banning the episode of Fawlty Towers involving the Germans and don't mention the war...
I mean come on even the Germans found that funny and is nothing that requires censorship to that degree to remove 1 episode from a total of only 12 of the funniest comedy of all time...

Morning A1ex, great posting yesterday, thank you.

In reply to a post by 'Weredoomed' last night:-

RE: Out of OrderThu 20:10
(I find it hard to believe that LSE would remove posters just because someone else has registered a complaint without checking out whether the complaint is valid or not.
Has anyone asked LSE about their barring commenters policy?)

I, personally have never reported any post, removing a post I feel is wrong, some spend considerable time to write a post just for some non-invested disrupter to report it, a better way would be to enable apart from the recommended option as in to mark up a post an opposite option as in to mark down a post, ADVFN has the thumbs up and thumbs down option BUT is crucially flawed in that only a fee-paying Premium member has the right to ever mark down a post, the thumbs down button does not work for non-fee paying members and by coincidence, a premium member is very unlikely to ever get permanently removed, unlike here.

I have heard that it takes as few as three report posts if the poster reporting can identify a specific LSE posting rule that has been violated, we have no proof who else reported Lucretius but we do know Spikeyj did as he admitted it, if his mates join in also then that is three report posts, the fact that various others such as DWF have in the past goaded Lucretius and got him previously banned soon adds up and with past suspensions to his name it is easy to see how LSE may have just pulled the plug and permanently banned Lucretius which is not at all fair as Lucretius was a very intelligent gentleman who did not take fools lightly and was easily goaded to respond, unfortunately.
LSE does not have the resources to look back at the previous discussions to come to an opinion on who started what and pulled the first punch, just easier to ban and then multiple bans lead to permanent removal, whether you started it or not!
I hope that helps.