Member Info for IAGLongterm

What do you mean, how much the share has come down? Course you’re going to get a rise but no one believes you about selling at a low and buying at a high. You’d sell everything at the end of today if you were smart!

The Sundezena show! Lol….

Sundezena is talking to himself! Lol.....

What a clown…….

Sundezena the Clown, IAG is down nearly 2% on euro markets and look at the price of oil? What are you talking about!

"Lufthansa up more than 2 % on Monday. It bodes well for the REAL holders."

BS: you said you were holding for a much higher number, no one believes you Sundezena!

“Ps..i sold half of my holding at £4.60 you great muppet!!”

PS Profit taking, which I took some of the day before yesterday, only to reinvest soon. I still hold Nvidia as it is a LT growth driver, airlines were when they hit the bottom during covid. Way too risky now!

Sundezena thinks he makes day trades, proven wrong as would have lost yesterday! If a stock is down for a week it doesnt mean its down for a month? Bit of a clown for sure......

You sell when you hit your target or hang on and be greedy like yourself after missing the boat!

Sundezena the Clown, I don't care about the rise yesterday or the fall over the last few weeks. Even the fall today! Lol, i am happy not to be invested in IAG.

Shengis_Khan — you say I’m muted, yet you answer me still,

Quoting my words with remarkable will.

Strange kind of silence, loud and precise,

For someone who claims they don’t listen twice.

You laugh at the patterns you think you’ve exposed,

As if markets are neat and neatly composed.

“Called it,” “buying,” “positions that bend”—

You mock the moves, but miss the trend.

For trading’s no script that stays the same,

It shifts with the wind, it plays no game.

Adapt or be stubborn—that’s the divide,

I’ll change with the tide; you can mock from the side.

Receipts, you ask, like it’s court, not a chart,

But conviction isn’t measured in posting your part.

You watch, you quote, you clearly care—

For someone “muted,” you’re very aware.

So laugh if you want, call it all a show,

Yet here you are, reading every flow.

And if I’m just noise in your grand plan—

Why echo me back, Shengis_Khan?

Shengis_Khan you should rely on Sundezena, nice speech! lol.....

PS, I am also invested in AI, Energy and funny enough, Amazon, which is performing a hell of a lot better than airlines! I bought the dip on airlines during COVID and cleaned up, but it took 3 years. I'm not hanging around again for a small gain here; the strides being made elsewhere aren't worth it. Sundezena will for sure not convince me lol!

There’s a fair point on confirmation bias. If you ask for risks, you’ll get a risk-heavy answer, same as only reading bearish notes. The difference is how you use it. If you test both sides, it sharpens your thinking; if you don’t, then yes, it becomes noise. I use AI every day and it enhances how I structure and analyse things, not replace them. The real risk is outsourcing judgment. Do you prefer Sundezenas-style “up up up” and “buy more” after the fact? I obviously use AI, I’ve even written poems about him, but I’m not spending hours crafting posts for an anonymous share price forum.

Also, do you believe that humans can use AI as a tool to enhance their understanding of issues or positions? Of course they can, those that are not using it are the ones losing out.

Your point about authenticity is valid, and if someone relies on AI without understanding or owning the ideas, it can make the discussion feel hollow and undermine credibility. But people can also use AI as a tool to enhance their own thinking, refining arguments and expressing ideas more clearly rather than replacing the thought process altogether. The real issue isn’t AI itself, but uncritical dependence on it. If someone can’t stand behind or explain what they’ve written, then the discussion loses meaning, regardless of how polished it sounds. And honestly, I don’t have the time to read through a wall of rubbish text if it’s not even clear that the person behind it understands it.

Fair enough I’m questioning inconsistencies in what’s being posted, which is part of discussing the investment case.

If someone makes bold claims about the company or their trades, it’s reasonable for others to challenge that, otherwise the board just becomes noise. That’s not “hate”, it’s scrutiny. If AI helps, why not!

I agree with you on one thing though — the focus should stay on the company and the industry. That includes calling out both good and bad takes, as long as it stays grounded in the facts.

Regarding the company: The main risks to IAG share price right now are driven by a tough macro setup: rising oil prices increase jet fuel costs and squeeze margins, while geopolitical tensions can disrupt routes and push costs even higher. At the same time, weaker consumer demand in a slowing economy limits how much airlines can raise ticket prices, creating a margin squeeze from both sides. Although IAG uses fuel hedging, this only offers temporary protection, and the market is more focused on future unhedged exposure. Overall, the stock is highly sensitive to oil prices and economic conditions, meaning volatility is likely until those stabilise. This is not going to stabilise for a while yet, mark_rs, any insight you have would be great......yourself and Sundezena with your expert opinions....

These contradictions matter because they point to a lack of a consistent, testable investment strategy. When someone claims long-term conviction but reacts short-term, or presents hindsight as foresight, it creates a misleading picture of skill and discipline. For a serious investor, this is dangerous — it can trigger false confidence, poor timing decisions, and FOMO-driven trades. In forums like LSE Share Chat, the real risk isn’t being wrong once, but following voices that appear confident yet lack consistency, transparency, and a repeatable process.

Long-term holder vs selling in volatility

→ Claims to hold for much higher prices

→ but also says he sells when things get shaky

Predictive trader vs hindsight posting

→ Implies he “called it”

→ but posts appear after moves, not before

“Buying more” repeatedly vs no verifiable entries

→ Frequently claims to add shares on dips

→ but gives no consistent prices, timing, or proof

Long-term investing mindset vs short-term reactions

→ Talks about medium/long-term gains

→ but behaviour looks reactive to daily swings

High confidence claims vs shifting narrative

→ Speaks with certainty about outcomes

→ but stance seems to change depending on market direction