Member Info for howezap

We did have Manica, had received revenue from about half of the open pittable ore before offloading it, but forgive me for pointing out that while we had it, it did nothing for the share price then, what is to say the share price would be any different now. You cannot use the rationale to have kept based purely on gold price.

Hi Mike main market listing has been bought up many times and is s reasonable possibility but main target is to cross list on ASX where peer comparisons currently show Greatland is hugely undervalued presently. Please take a look at member MH01 history, sharing some great research on market caps of oz peers.

On “After Shaun's interview...” thread posted on 16 Feb 2025 @ 18:22

Yes very nice thanks for sharing.

Aptly looks like a mini golden champagne tower!

Make that 82 wheels 🤦

Impressive 240 ton payload !

Gross weight including tractor unit you’re looking at 270 ton over 21 axles with 42 wheels. Autonomously driven will need a bitumen roadway. 🤔

On the subject of copper, there was talk a couple of years back of hare brained scheme to introduce tiered copper price structuring. Whereby the sale price is set on the mine and its operator’s carbon footprint. Lower the footprint, higher the rate received. . Sounds daft but if it will tip the economic viability of a mining operation toward using renewables, where fossil fuelled plant and power sources would be likely preferred due to cost, then it is maybe not as daft as it sounds.

In jurisdictions such as the Australias where governments are setting increasingly higher targets to actively increase renewable energy to balance grids across power networks, projects like Hav could benefit and I’m sure you will see obligations to employ renewables with ever increasing ESG compliances that count massively in obtaining mining permits.

Will see what hoops GGP will have to jump through to get Havieron permissions. But, it will though, be a modernised, efficient, next generation mine with electric drills, shovels and loaders that will be more befitting of its ‘beautiful’ ore body. Won’t be a dirty mine!

I get ya now, if memory serves he did allude to the potential grades being between .6 and 1%cu which sounds about right. Grade control drilling at mine face when mined would have determined the cut offs and grades to divert to run of mine or to stockpile. It would be reasonable to assume these grades, as generally would not be mixed with material with no economic value ie overburden etc. The term dump is a little misleading.

A fair assumption would be these ore dumps due to scale would have come from commercial operations and not artisanal mining.

I’m not so sure about the MMP JV terms. Unless MMP were really taking the p1ss it was a clear cut, net profit royalty. It wasn’t a gross royalty. A Net profit royalty typically allows for a larger scope of costs to be deducted which could have included capital and financing costs before the royalty was payable. The MMP plant they supplied, already had $11m spent on it and I know was the key reason for agreeing their particular Collaboration Agreement and royalty. I wonder if this aspect could have been a cause of dispute.

Anyways, water under the bridge now.

Best, Guy

Due anytime, whatever the updated MRE contains 'will' see inclusion of the last two years resource definition drilling, plus from both target and mountain block extensions to the main vein and continuity of strike of 75 vein that will see a decent uplift in resource.

These particular results will have the impact that matters the most on the mining plan and schedule at the business end from across newsflow. Q1 production update will be another, but will they reveal the financials alongside those production figures? If not, may have to wait for half year report for those would generally be audited.

With gold price surging, certainly been great timing, couldn’t have wished for this scenario.

“i'd also argue the likelihood of it containing more than 0.25% average is minimal.”

What is that based on Ben if I may ask?

The ore dumps are not from tailings but unprocessed lower graded oxides that wasn’t previously processed along with the much higher graded sulphides at that time. Every mine wherever, will stockpile the lower grade material that would have been previously un economic.

It’s out the ground and in huge supply so AISC will be considerably less to potentially be able to bring it into a processing schedule and with big plants that will now be accepting these oxides there is every chance of being viable against current and rising copper sale pricing.

Came to same conclusion Chester

Thanks for your time

“We all look for something going places.”

Couldn’t agree more CP, there is also a really good back story too behind it which is really important for PI’s particularly, with not only current affairs spotlighting AMRQ’s strategic advantages but also behind the recommissioning of the super high grade and historically low AISC Nalunaq mine. Which revenues will now allow them to unlock further mineral potential from across their large land package in developing what could ultimately see a multi mine operating company in reasonable timeframe. Leveraging their assets and expertise with other parties when activities elsewhere increase also cannot be underestimated.

Just how fast can this company grow?

Those updates will be pivotal.

Once again billy completely misses the point and then quotes utter bollards based on his own honest opinion. There’s a surprise.

Fair one

Hi Jez don’t recall myself of any other than Kalengwa but as we were probably all aware was more likely the relationship with their JV partners KPZ had soured as they were broke had caused them to pull out and impairment of costs.

Think Kalengwa would have had a good chance due to the really high grades previously mined but wasn’t it quite isolated? I’m sure I recall it being off the grid something like 60-70km from processing facilities (without checking)

If these muck away jobs can reduce downstream dilution then what is there not to show some positivity for the scheme.

C’mon guys your investment is worth what it is today.. end of! If you believe Colin can make 6,7,10 times return from here then you must believe in what he is trying to achieve and would hopefully want to get behind him.

Lucky, hi, I’ve been saying the same thing for ages.

Hi Monty ironically I was the only one to have previously pointed out the theiceberg was probably working for the company. But no I’m not.

I would suggest anyone that is not accepting of how the company is run to sell up. Kwadoku is probably sitting back with his feet up pi55ing himself laughing at having to do FA to diss the company anymore. It’s own so called shareholders are doing a fine job of that on their own.

There should be some good opportunities for shareholders to make money, the tide will change soon you can count on it.

Wtf you couldn’t be any more out of touch. Are not tailings they are revisiting but copper oxides around the 1% per ton range, left out of mine plans where higher grade sulphides where targeted in initial mining operations. Cheaper back then to have put aside as require a diffeent processing method. I believe Jubilee would disagree there isn’t profit to be made. Rising copper prices will be driving this forward too.

Https://audioboom.com/posts/8649900-sunday-roast-featuring-leon-coetzer-ceo-of-jubilee-metals-aim-jlp-and-colin-bird-chairman-o

Talks about the latest deal to determine waste dump potential. Previously mined oxides that was never processed due to previously being considered low grade. Outcome of test work could see off site processing returning revenues that could cover company operating costs and more.

“If it was that good everyone would be doing it. “

This has always been my point that XTr are in the enviable position with income to jump in early to set up these opportunities ahead of most peers at this difficult time for all small caps to obtain working capital.

Cheap, low risk, quick return, if copper does what it’s meant to do then would be even more bread and butter for the company to push forward.

Archer does talk a helluva lot of sense, the discovery of new big deposits is just a beginning. Greenland is not only mineral rich, but there are as bigger points to consider equally. It is hardly explored previously due to being inaccessible with its icy climate and geography. Now as ice caps melt it has started to retreat, these minerals are becoming increasingly accessible along with modern exploration tools and techniques to exploit them more efficiently and economically, with AMRQ at the forefront way ahead of any major even.

It’s not as though the majors have been there before and through whatever internal, external political or economic reasoning had decided to move on to other jurisdictions which they often do. Zambia is a prime example of majors returning to its huge potential of minerals due to its shift in political agenda.

One of the biggest hurdles that miners face in bringing a mine to production are ESG compliances. Greenlands climate and geography hosts minimal forna and flora, so is no where near as ecologically sensitive a region toward obtaining its permissions along with a supportive government.

Just search Pebble mine to appreciate the difficulties that environmental and ecological complications can throw up.

The monopolised growth potential is going to be massive and growth is already the buzz word.

Throw in the increasing global interest on top of an extremely competent management, already highly desirable assets, and that growth ability from a huge free cash flow margin by mid year there is so much to be positive about starting with the updated MRE due soon.

Crypto is neither a stock, nor a commodity, nor cash. It’s its own unregulated asset class. It is not an investment!!

How the hell anyone can compare it with gold is beyond belief.

Can we ‘not’ discuss it here any further.

Yes that is correct, as is a cross listing and the companies current share equity will be accessed from both indexes, the share price will remain equal across both listings including from overlapping trading hours. Any difference will largely be down to currency exchange rates but will remain within a close percentage.