Member Info for Howey1927

*flow

I would suggest it's too early to make that call. If the file we've seen is the limit at the present time, 2nd compressor without a doubt.

However, if they are able to up production from this level, then we are very much covering the hedge and might wish to still the sidetrack to accelerate production further.

Is there a reason that has been cited as to why we can't do both in parallel?

Thanks Noel, I can see the data when I run the report now.

Tom, is the 5.37 for yesterday? I can't see the details for yesterday yet, when I run the report.

Tygra, I predicted £13.47. You missed that one out!

When I saw the RNS, I anticipated a little blip but it's held up quite nicely. Onwards and Upwards!

Scrub that, Tomhuk was right. 43m.

66.5m (just under) in total baits.

My assesment of the situation is that there MUST be something other than Paul Forrest needing a new washing machine!

SV, I do hope you're not being sarcastic!

P.S. The webinar is on Tuesday, October 4th. Just for any idiot investors who didn't read the RNS properly!

DRB, the thing that makes me wonder is the RNS to notify us of the webinar. Why was there one? None of the other interviews had and RNS before they were announced!

Either there is new info about to emerge that is price sensitive OR they used an RNS to advertise the company. I'm pretty certain the 2nd one is allowed!

Therefore, we must be about to get some form of update but surely the update itself cannot be announced in the webinar and will need to notified to the market in an RNS of it's own? Exciting few days ahead, once again!

Oh FFS! Thanks Ocelot.

Evening everyone. I am unable to dial in so a brief summary will be much appreciated until I can watch it later.

How is it so far?

Thanks.

Welcome back baits, not that you left for very long! I wish you nothing but riches!

Bottom_Feeler, it's in cubic metres so you need to convert to cubic feet to get the MMSCF (x 35.315)

RT, not only have you misunderstood what Tomhuk said and accused him of something he didn't say, you also sparked off the chuckle twins!

Read Tom's post again!

Maybe @6pm, Yanis!

I still don't understand why the webinar is or is allowed to be an RNS. There's nothing regulatory about a webinar. The content of it, yes but that should be RNS'd (as I'm sure it will), not the webinar itself.

Forgive my ignorance here but why is this RNS material? Is it likely there's something fundamentally different that he is going to announce above and beyond the other interviews?