Member Info for Howey1927

Go_ly_down, put in those terms, it's an absolute no brainer. Exciting times just around the corner.

GLA

The noises are starting to sound more like an Opera singer than a Death Metal band. Something is brewing and it isn't the beans I had for breakfast!

GLA

Just let the bludy thing flow, is all I ask! Closer to 4 years for many of us Push!

GLA.

Almost exactly the same as my time here, jc. Apart form the impasse between TL and Oz, this is an absolute no brainer. The resources are enormous and more importantly, gas which is what most countries are looking for to get their footprints down.

Both sides are starting to make more favourable noises so fingers crossed, there's a pragmatic solution to be found.

GLA.

jc, that is probably the most positive statement I've heard, apart from HFB!

Let's hop there's some action to back up the words now! Decades of inactivity.

You're not the only one Merc but there's nothing to get too excited about at the moment. A bit of news needed to get things moving again. GLA

Miner, he gets VERY excited about 88e. He also uses WAY too many words in virtually every post. However, if you filter through all the sheite, he does know stuff that can be useful. Good luck.

Hence my point about using the identity of the purchaser. I'm not sure if that known/available in the data on LSE for example. I'd imagine not otherwise, I'd expect it to be used.

It's irrelevant! Rob, you bought those shares but someone else sold them to you so which one do you record?

I know if provides comfort to see more buys than sells but there isn't one without the other! You could look at it from a point of view of who is buying the shares, an MM or a Shareholder and use that as a guide. But that isn't what this board does, it's based on where the transaction is in relation to the midprice and I assume is intended to demonstrate SP trend at the time.

Welcome on board Croq!

Ha ha!

Isla, my apologies. We have a regular nuisance and I thought the inheritance was his latest attempt at getting back on the board. Condolences on your loss and I of course wish your all of the best with your shares. In the short-term I suspect you'll do better here as I believe/hope ANGS is on the brink of a major breakthrough.

Keep an eye on Push's posts for technical detail and then try to find a happy mix of detail from the board as a whole as there are positive, negative and indifferent posters.

I have previously invested in UKOG and had a mixed time of it. That said UKOG has a couple of irons in the fire and it only takes one bit of positive news to see a sharp increase. I've not been on their board for a while so I can't recommend posters to look out for.

What you need to do is decide is what level of profit/loss you are wanting/willing to take and don't look back!

Good luck.

Morning all. I was busy yesterday afternoon/evening so only caught up on the posts this morning.

I'm particularly interested in this IslaRose 'new' poster. As soon as I saw the 1 post and read about the inherited UKOG and ANGS shares I was immediately suspicious. I've just checked the history and on 20th December 'she' posted about it being a good time to top up into the rise next year.

This did nothing to quell my suspicion. You know who I think it is!

I give you all credit for your help, apart from WG who weirdly detailed the formation of the company, but I suspect it was misplaced. I apologise in advance blah blah and I suspect I'll get a message on Telegram to say it's not but pretty convinced!

Morning Gideons.

I'll still give you the time of day.

HITS, my apologies for the slow response, I was busy in work and we're away for the weekend so I've been on the road.

I knew you'd 'expect more of me' but I'm afraid what I posted needed to be said. I find it almost impossible to believe that you have gained that level of knowledge of people who don't post on here and the companies they are involved in, simply from visits to other boards a few years ago, whilst deciding where to invest. I held UKOG for a good while (piece of **** share) but I wouldn't feel able to respond to Ocelot the way you did about them.

I also find it very convenient that the messages were deleted for no apparent reason, unless someone else wants to accept responsibility for reporting them? There was nothing in them that was dodgy so admin would only have acted upon the request of someone, in my view.

I've always been civil with you and I have been in these posts. There are others who have always said what this has made me suspect but I've always given you the benefit of their doubt.

Now I'm less sure that what you have always maintained is true.

Sorry mate but those are my thoughts.

For those that missed it before it got mysteriously removed, in reponse to Ocelot's post last night, HITS let slip that he/she/them has a pretty good working knowledge of what is going on over at UKOG and UJO with particular reference to Heid and their input.

Now for some reason, the post from HITS, my response questioning such knowledge and, apparently, HITS response to my challenge were removed.

I have started this thread so HITS can again share their response. My challenge was, for someone who has posted exclusively on ANGS (I checked 60 pages of history, only ANGS posts) so I simply asked how HITS can have such knowledge of other boards without EVER posting on them when they are so prevalent here. What other ID's do you operate HITS?

This is quite important because you quite often deride other posters because they suggest there is a network of ID's operated by an individual or small group of individuals!

I look forward to you response.

Why? No went of course.

Shame? I suspect you got it deleted. Went were they removed? There was nothing in your original post or my reply that contravened any rules.

Did the mask slip?

Morning HITS. Where are people claiming that it will multi-bag by close? I've not seen much/any of that.

WG, you fail to mention that £18.2m (if it's £20m as you suggest) comes back to ANGS by way of tax levy. So not quite as expensive as you keep suggesting!