Member Info for Howey1927

Totally agree.

Very good BV.

:-)

Not at all suspicious!

Let's hope so, Donek.

I'm loving this clamour for sensible posts and patience. How about a 'sensible' RNS? That was the cause of yesterday's complaints, from me certainly.

It's a response, that's a good thing! I asked the connection question Singhie but I suspect any response would be along similar lines.

They will update again very soon.

It shouldn't require analysis, it should be abundantly clear!

It's not how I'm reading it, it's the way it's been written! I know we are going to see a near-term doubling of output but that RNS doesn't state this in clear terms and could be read to suggest there is a reduction in flow! It's an appalling effort given they've had 14 days to craft something that would give a clear and concise picture of the next weeks/months. Also, to remove all reference to connecton to the grid is just bizare. The daily report is out and there is no meaningful increase showing for yesterday.

Push, I take your points about the care needed to fabricate the permanent connection to the grid but the first mention of temporary infrastructure and the need for more build came in the RNS! Why not have this as a step in the infographic that was posted a while back so it was clear? They must have known about it all along!

I shouldn't be surprised but they genuinely are shocking at comms!

I will do so now, Tom. It's badly needed as I suggested so, on Twitter myself earlier.

Bistable, I think you were totally justified in your immediate reaction to the RNS and I shared your concerns.

Everyone who knows me on here will accept that I want this to work more than anything but I'm not willing to blindly join the tiker tape parade just because I want it to work.

I THINK the results behind today's RNS are pretty good but I don't know for sure because they couldn't have written a worse RNS if they tried. It is shocking!

It states and I quote "Based on the results we have concluded that at present, the well is capable of 4-5 mmscfd at a FWHP of 30 barg flowing into the system with the two other wells."

Whilst I accept (and jolly well hope) that means there will be an additional 4-5mmscfd, it doesn't say that. It says that the rate of flow is 4-5 WITH the other 2 wells. Who proof read that and thought, "yeah, that'll do"? The immediate reaction in the market is understandable in my view and I'm thoroughly hacked off by it.

It's gone from the sublime to ridiculous. Through March we had Twitter updates on 2nd, 8th x 2, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 20th x 2, 21st, 22nd x 2, 23rd x 2, 27th, 28th, 29th, 30th and then 4th April. These then stopped completely.

We had the 28th March RNS where they stated they expected "first export during the week of 7 April" but by the 4th April RNS we were told flow was up to 4mmscfd after 60 hours flow with linear increase with no deviation but the connection date of the 7th has disappeared and they were going to connect to the plant directly after the clean-up. ".........we expect to realise the combined flow rates of all three wells later in the month".

Then nothing for over 2 weeks until today's rushed, unprofessional update in which we learn there is a temporary flowline set-up in place that will be replaced to acheive full plateau during the summer. The linear increase with no deviation ended the moment they wrote it down so it seems and the connection to the grid isn't mentioned at all.

Push, I accept that much of this may come as no surprise to you with your experience but it's news to me and almost every other person on this board, whether they are willing to admit it or not.

Cynders, I was somwhat surprised by your reaction saying "idoits wanting instant success and gas flows". You need to look at the timeline to get us here in comparison with what GL and the board have stated. We were meant to have paid off the debt and start receiving a dividend in a matter of weeks accordig to George's interviews!

Before I get jumped by the usual mob, I'm not deramping, I'm not selling up, I still believe this will come good and I really, really want you all to make a good wedge from this. However, they do not help themselves and today's RNS is probably the worst, laziest, half rrrsed attempt (or lack thereof) I've seen!

GLA.

I must admit, so am I. Whilst the figures are decent, they haven't increased a great deal above the flow after 60 hours, 2 weeks ago.

Still, plenty more revenue. Push2's input on the vague description of why the need for further work and a temporary connection would be good.

GLA.

*Aren't!

I almost joined his whacky crusade for a moment then!

Mr008 has been quiet for sometime. I've even unfiltered him to see what was going on.

It's quite staggering but he seems to have accepted we are drilling into the Irish Sea!

It's been a good day so far. GLA

Singhie, I not only like your theory but support it. I posted similar on Twitter yesterday and it was largely accepted as credible.

Thanks for the effort you put in.

Set your alarms for 6.55am folks.

GLA.

Whistler, I have put your point directly to ANGS on Twitter so let's see if they respond. It would make perfect sense if it were the case. Let's see if they respond.

Anyone who pays any actual attention to what Gavin says needs to give their head a wobble! I find it quite amusing that he pops up when news is almost inevitable that some will drop and claims to 'know'! Then again, I'm not basing anything I do on what he says.

I'm not stressed, I'm bored! Each morning I wake up and hope there's an RNS waiting for me/us and each day, they let me/us down. I know it's coming but despite Push's assurances, I can't help but have a niggling doubt that something isn't quite right. Sorry!

ANGS, pull your sodding fingers out and gives us a wonderful intraday so Singhie and Gallder can update their daily figures with some much bigger numbers!

GLA.

Sorry if posted earlier Daz but who are you on Twitter? I'll take a look.

No, you've got me there Phil, can't think of anyone.

They are regulated by the FCA and are mainly the big banks and finance houses. Google market makers uk and you'll find a list somewhere.

2 brand new LSE accounts arguing over a share is strange.

Welcome onboard folks.

Thank you Gallder.

Thank you Singhie. One of these days it'll read:

??/04/2023 00:00 12/04/2023 System Entry Volume, Saltfleetby, D+1 0.345 ***BOOM***