RE: Wednesdays 2025 results - I expect a game changer.23 Oct 2025 07:20
2/2
But let us say an additional £62m (£130m - £68m) MDA revenue with gross margin at 20% ie £12m.
The transceiver side was flat last year (and I think in the previous 15 month period) but it is the sort of thing that may pick up after a period of abeyance. Then there should be contribution from Nexus albeit Mr Tucker has said the rollout will be cautious (but there are back orders to fill - remarkably patient customers!). So, at the least, overall transceivers should make some progress albeit in the near term quite modest.
So I would have thought next year is looking more like £5.5m (after tax) plus £12m (before tax) and possibly a bit extra from transceivers.
Tax should be at 25% and accounting wise that will be booked as a p&l charge as the deferred tax asset for tax losses is unwound. From a cash perspective as they have £21m of RECOGNISED tax losses (there is also a bigger figure disclosed of £35m TOTAL tax losses - so presumably some tax tax losses are not deemed recoverable, but unusually this is not explained) they probably have a year or so where no tax will be paid but they will receive the R&D tax credit - at the moment about £700k.
So the £12m reduces by 25% to £9m and with the £5.5m gets to £14.5m - a rather more comfortable number to base forward p/e on for a £200m+ m/cap plus business.
One word of caution is that Mr Tucker said in the recent webcast that the intention was to raise staffing from 160 to 200. I think most of these will end up assigned to projects as, hopefully, new projects come in but there will be some increase in overhead for those that are not and so doing R&D. It will, however, take some time to recruit.
By way of note admin expenses stayed flat at £17m despite the prior period being three months longer. I think what is happening here is that, absent a live project, under accounting standards IT staff have to be, effectively, charged to overheads but once they are working on a revenue generating project their costs go through cost of sales. If I am right this may be a factor pushing down admin costs as the projects last year only started part way through that year.
The Final Results statement was rather thin on detail so some matters are difficult to determine. I have felt the same for some of the previous financial information. They need to upgrade a bit and perhaps get a more experienced audit firm to help them. One example is that I understand from talk on another bulletin board that they have got a new loan facility from Barclays, presumably after the year end, but no mention of that as a post balance sheet event.
Any views welcome. No doubt I have made a few mistakes!