RE: James Dramper1 Dec 2020 12:39
I am not sure JD is the whole problem, but he is without doubt part of the problem. He is of course very inexperienced, clearly naive and all in all a bit lightweight for the CEO's role, which does not help matters. Last year he was a bit over excitable and then seemed to be caught in the headlights when things started to go wrong.
To an extent, the business has been built on a bit of bluster from the start, top named 'advisory panel', which it transpires JD contacted through LinkedIn and asked them if they would like some free shares. What they actually do I am not sure anyone knows. Unnecessary talk of a 10m spending budget, simply declared to placate angry shareholders about a year ago…talk about digging a bigger hole for yourself. I don't think JD is lying, not on purpose anyway; it strikes me that he is simply naive and totally misjudged the responsibilities of the role, and the weight his comments would carry. He was certainly egged on by JW who really played him for a while, all for his own gain, bit cruel really knowing his lack of experience. Without doubt, these antics have been detrimental to the SP.
The truth is Bidstack is still very small, when they tweet something they only have about 2000 followers, I know pets that have more than that. They are struggling to get traction and I would imagine they are still giving away more than they are selling.
However, this is without doubt a great business idea, it makes so much sense, and with all credit to JD, he spotted it and he did something about it. He deserves to do well from it, I just hope he realises his own limitations, and starts to use those with experience around him. He seems easy to take advantage of, and needs a return from those on the advisory panel.
This really could go either way, right now I would be quite happy to hear of a takeover, 15p would do me. And I wouldn’t have contemplated saying that a year ago. This may only be the start, but it is becoming perilously close to looking like the end.