Member Info for HHReturns

And a hunter aka Elmer spreading Fud

Well spotted Massive lol.

The SP went to £1.59 on that offer, from memory. It was for a nano-second but that isn't far from £1.70

Realistically, the II's have got bigger fish to fry than trying to squeeze a few more pence out here, I would think.

They will all have lost a fortune on their holdings here anyway, as will have typically been in since a couple of quid a share or more. Just get rid of it, so that they can move on I suspect will be their plan.

Having worked in a bank myself for a long time, I know that pensioners and employees may have suffered with the share price hit. Some of that was unfortunately from having too many eggs in one basket though, and perhaps not seeking or taking advice at the appropriate time.

Just because someone accrued tens or hundreds of thousands of share via initially nil risk employee shares schemes doesn't mean that upon maturity they needed to keep that investment in the same single share, rather than diversifying into a wider portfolio. It's painful obviously, but not the sole fault of the company.

Let's face it, in reality the share price shouldn't have been as high as it previously got to anyway. It was based on lies and false profits as a result of misstatements in the financials for many years. The profits were never there to the extent that was claimed.

Melted maybe.

Could have been banned, but I doubt it. If so, look out for a new poster who makes 50 posts a day, and that will be them reborn.

Perhaps they have choked on their own verbal diarrhoea?

STFU

There were whoppers as well.

The 0.799 ones were both busy also.

What do you think an appropriate market cap should be here Clintek?

What are you on about Zag? Less than £5k indeed? It's a good couple of hundred quid more than that lol.

They changed their guidance at least 3 times, before removing it completely. Initially they (again from memory) talked about being cash flow positive this year, then said they needed a certain amount of disposals to do it due to weakening / higher losses / blah blah blah (insert another reason that is anyone other than Woods fault) and then they guided that they needed even more disposals to hit the cash neutral figure. You can't keep selling valuable stuff off and expect to hit the figures, changing the goalposts again and again. These are the disposals needed to keep the wolves from the door, not to transport Wood into some wonderful and profitable future.

If the bid fails and no other whack job comes forward then I expect them to do a big D4E as a best case scenario and admin as a worst case.

Have your own opinion, fine, but don't shout everyone else out and also come back and apologise if you get it wrong as you are presenting unknowns as facts and misrepresenting the situation. You are deliberately ignoring what the Board has said in multiple RNS's!

Still, it would have been handy to have as cash...

I'm not a fan of some seemingly sensible people being booted from this Telegram group just because they are asking some pointed questions. I don't know the ins and outs of what happened but on the face of it these are not ranters and as shareholders are entitled to ask questions when communication and sp performance has been poor. Just booting people out at the first sign of pointed questions is not a good look, if that is what has happened.

It's 7th November 2025 today ...

8th October that says ..

By your logic though Ice, one of three things will happen.

Either the vote will pass and they will pay out 30p, a new bidder will emerge and pay more or Wood will go it alone merrily gambolling through the meadows of commerce making buckets of profit suddenly, after failing to actually do so for years (except when fudging it's accounts

If those are the 3 accounts (as you discount by the sounds of it a painful D4E, a rights issue at a penny or two or a bust scenario) then again, why aren't the II's piling in?

Even if they don't know which one of your 3 it will be, if all three are worth more than the current SP then surely they would buy all they can.

Perhaps all possible scenarios aren't worth more than 20p a share, and that is why they haven't piled in....

Because you are delusional.

For example, your comment about Wood being undervalued at £2 plus 16 months ago. According to whom? Oh yes, the Board in response to a 'bid' that was never formalised once the books were seen. What else were they going to say? We are disappointed that we didn't receive a formal bid of £2.30 post due diligence as we would have snapped their hand off - once you look under the bonnet we are a bag of spanners and barely worth our debt.

If the board truly believes that £2.30 undervalues the company then why go begging for a 30p bid now, for the good of the workers?

You are funny though. You are about as Icecool as the centre of the Sun.

Nice deflection. No point discussing with a fruit loop though. It's unfortunate that I can't filter you as you monopolise the chat here and insist that you are the only person who knows anything here. You predicted a 20p close, did you?

You've changed your tune (again) You said it was just early market moves earlier (or some such crap) When it was 27p then there was a different narrative I suppose. If it rises back to that level then it will be that narrative again maybe! I actually think you're crazy,but it's nice in a way. Enjoy the fluffy bubble of being bonkers.