RE: Ignore them18 Dec 2024 20:11
Pete, just to respond to your earlier post, a section of which read:
'not assisted by may of the ludicrous and unreaslitic, baseless and in some cases pure fantasy predictions and projections from the more deluded and optimistic of posters. Who and how many were telling us that the FS would be out before the ML approval'
Firstly I think you make a valuable contribution to the board, as does Cat, Bluebay and countless others, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything that's posted, and this is one such occasion.
I really don't know why you feel the need to be so condescending to other posters, particularly fellow investors who are only trying to help other investors. I am one of the individuals who you elude to in your post, and yes I was wrong in stating the Feasibility Study would be coming out before the Mining Licence was approved, as did others. But you don't know the reason why this was stated. Certainly for myself (and I'm sure for others) we wanted to know why the FS, or at least the resource estimates were not released so sought an answer. As the company were unresponsive myself (and I'm sure others) contacted the broker. The broker explicitly stated the FS was not released because it was incomplete. It was completed enough to get the ML approved but the full document would be finished the end of November and released to the market early December. It was for that reason I posted on it, and for that reason I asked the question to Lorna yesterday would they be releasing it. Upon getting her answer there's no other way to put it, their broker lied. I don't know why, he could have easily said I can't discuss it, or given the answer Lorna did, but he didn't.
So you call it ludicrous, baseless, fantasy etc if you want. I just call it being lied to.
Anyway, I like to think I too contribute some value to the board, so thought on this occasion I should defend myself, and others.
Ramble over.