RE: Congo30 Aug 2023 13:19
Well done Banboring and you have just illustrated part of the problem: you hold forth on here with opinions but unfortunately the opinions are worthless because they are formed based on a lack of information or understanding. But I will explain.
Company law in the UK says companies can issue however many shares they want SUBJECT To pre-emption rights and shareholder consent. So companies should issue the right to subscribe to existing shareholders first and then others second: And they need the shareholders' permission granted in a GM.
Listed companies get around this by having resolutions passed at the AGM where they can issue shares up to a certain amount without having to offer them to existing shareholders. These "permissions" hold until the next AGM or 13 months whichever is shorter. The permissions are capped to a certain number of shares (the headroom).
Once the company concerned has used up the headroom it can't issue any more shares until it gets another authority at a GM. RRR is in that position, it has used up its headroom and needs another authority to be able to issue shares. The exception is an hypothecated authority where authority is issued for a certain number of shares for a certain purpose: exercise of warrants, share options, conversion of loans or CLNs etc.
So in the case of the CLNs, RRR had an hypothecated authority for the conversion and warrants shares based on conversion at 0.6p and warrants at 0.8p. The RNS states that it needs another authority to issue the extra conversion and warrant shares in due course.
To issue more shares, RRR needs a GM. They have to issue notice and confirm the resolutions.
DYOR