Member Info for Heath23

To be fair the arguments raised by the poster are getting informative replies that actually strengthen AFCs technology and position. While it may be a little irritating it is certainly proving worthwhile, at least for me.

Very promising stance from António Guterres from the off - really feels like we’re waking up to the problem now

Hoping that the demo is using ammonia with the cracker rather than pure hydrogen

So is next Friday an official launch of the EV charger or a demo only? I take it any news of orders placed would need to come out via RNS either before or after the event, but not revealed as part of it?

Who are ABs buddies and what will they bring to the table?

You should get a column Jim as you clearly have insight into the inner workings of the market.

Also it’s worth remembering that it doesn’t matter what anyone says on this board - it won’t change what AFC will eventually deliver and their level of success. Some negative posts may scare a few investors off but you’ve got to look after yourself in that regard. What will happen will happen.

You can almost take the share price graph as both an indicator of ramping and bashing activity. To be fair we’ve got a lot of both going on at the moment.

So questions to AFC. Please cut and paste as you add to give a collated post please.

1. What is the timescale for completing longevity testing of electrodes for the HydroX-Cell(L)TM and obtaining a warranty?

2. How long is it likely to be before the HydroX-Cell(S)TM can be used in commercial ev chargers? Will the AlkaMem membrane be commercially available in the same timescale? Which metrics remain to be confirmed for this membrane?

3. What patents are still OS and what are the likely timescales for finalisation.

https://www.ammoniaenergy.org/articles/safety-assessments-of-ammonia-as-a-transportation-fuel/

Conclusions: ammonia risk levels are acceptable and similar to current fuels

Just a quick google - I'm no expert here!

Shouldn’t we also be talking about the transport of ammonia, not hydrogen? For off-grid the hydrogen will be produced locally to the cell from ammonia and for large scale the hydrogen will likely be available as waste on the site the cells are situated - no major transport necessary, just piping and purification.

This share drives me to the point of madness and occasion irrational acts so I’m sure it’s the same for everyone.

I wouldn’t trust your instincts Jim - you sold out at 6p just before the rise! (Hopefully you didn’t or got back in quickly.)

Someone’s algorithm has gone haywire!

Reading the RNS relating to AlkaMem I don’t see any reference to further development of the membrane itself being required - just its application in specific future technologies. Is that fair?

I look forward to finding out!

If it’s an off-grid solution it’ll need to be powered by the cell surely?

What is powering the cracker anyway - is it the fuel cell following an initial jump?

Good call - anything to make it as efficient as possible!

I remember there being improvements made with cycling up and down some time ago but perhaps not to the extent required for an EV charger. It would be a shame to compromise the cost per kw by continually running with no need but at least it would be constant and perhaps beneficial from a maintenance / wear perspective.