RE: Flawed Products?5 Dec 2020 11:20
What's up, doc? Not wrong at all. MED2005 failed because of placebo - fact:
10/12/19
"However, in FM57, MED2005 did not meet primary endpoints versus placebo"
I suggest you digest that fact yourself, doc, and it won't be any different with MED3000. The only people wrong about FUM's products as well as the resident rampers (yourself included in that category, doc) are FUM's very own management. Barder claiming to be closing a punchy numbered deal - WRONG. Ken claiming that MED2005 had 20 possible outcomes, all positive - WRONG! Hildreth ..... errr, where is she then? What's she doing? lol.
Enjoy the rest of your own weekend, doc, and don't get all bitter and twisted because you're in deep with this dog and obviously sitting on huge losses.
Have a nice day
Very strong sell