RE: This month….12 May 2022 22:42
The announcement from ARCM today goes to show the sheer scale of the cash needed to progress exploration properly across a 800,000 sq km licence, the deal they have done with Anglo American allows for circa $70m in exploration expenditure a sum their CEO describes as 'essential' to progress the project.
Before this deal ARCM has already spent $8m on the licence.
So why is this being mentioned on the ORR bulletin board, quite simply because it shows how farcical the business model at ORR is, the Central Licence Package in Cameroon is FOUR TIMES the size of Arc Minerals in Zambia and to date nothing has been spent, so how do ORR proceed ??
Livesey & Co seem to think they can mosey on with their £1.5m annual placings, digging here and there, this is clearly inadequate, they need a JV partner but are unlikely to attract one until, at least £5m - £10m is spent, if the results are good enough then a partner might come in.
It is worth noting that the old Stratex BOD, who were good at selling projects and bringing in partners, spent £7m in Senegal before Iamgold were brought in, so the aforementioned scenario in Cameroon is not unrealistic.
Like many suggest, the business model is flawed, it involves significant dilution for many years ahead until such a time drilling results are good enough to attract a funding partner, no wonder the CFO is suggesting dilution is not a problem.
The BOD need to prove they can proceed projects without ripping the guts out of equity holders, so far they most definitely have not.