RE: Wishful thinking7 Jul 2021 07:37
Actually Rookie I did not say HBR was a dog, although it clearly is. What I said was when I brought into PMO I thought it was a winner, and it was, but I took my eyes of the stock, what with Covid and all, and missed the new crooks on the block that is now HBR who basically robbed PMO shareholders with the help of Tony, et, al. I should have sold out then but I missed the opportunity, again my mistake.
As for the numbers, what's the point. None of us here have any idea what these guys are doing, do you really know, because I'm honest enough to say I don't. Even the so called analysts are doing their numbers on the back of fag packets, and coming up with the cash cow story that other posters repeat.
Simple math says that if your Capex on PB Oil is say $20, and the market price is now $75+ you should be making a lot of money. That would have been the case if it was still PMO but it ain't. Problem now is as before; liabilities - licenses, Capex, hedging, debt, lenders, unknowns, and Bond Holders, etc, etc. This HBR outfit is set up to benefit these entities not us so lets see what happens in the next year
Maybe their all correct and I'm just a bad loser. Simple fact is I lost money on this investment and those amateur theorists that suggest the SP will double, are, as I've said before missing the point. If the SP doubles it will not give pay back to original PMO investors. Diluting the shares made it worse because at 20p, or lower, it was easier to average down on the cheap with higher volume. Same same I know but looked better. Only those lucky enough to buy in at sub 20p will maybe win. Time will tell.
Apologies for the use of 'armature', and yes it is part of an electric motor.
All theory of course and investors make their own decisions, good or bad.
HC