Member Info for gwilliams71

: one who denies, refuses, opposes, - NO! I don't deny the facts regarding this company. I suggest you do. I don't refuse to see the limitations - you do. I don't oppose this company, it's activities or it's aims, i oppose it's abject failure to perform it's duty to share holders. Wouldn't it be good if they gave us regular information !

or is skeptical or cynical I'm skeptical yes, tough not to be after 7 years watching share value being eroded. And for those that talk of the 11p spike - that was relatively short lived and once the facts came to light the value tanked again to the hard deck. Cynical - hard not to be knowing the facts and given track record.

In short Ocelot - you're trying to defend the indefensible. you're refusing to accept facts and simply spouting positive background noise - i very much hope it's not in the attempt to attract unsuspecting buyers by filling the board daily with unsubstantiated, pie in the sky spin. Mind you they can get that from any number of SS interviews: Train is leaving the station, in the Bahamas at $70 per barrel, Gatwick Gusher, National Significance, Transformative.

Morning Ocelot -don't know who you're referring to as naysayers but having 1 million shares means i have a vested interest in this company and it is not doing well, it's BOD keep chasing rainbows, very little income stream, very few hard prospects of bringing any change in the short to medium term (and i mean upto 3 years at least) and the share price is a tad above one tenth of a penny. One tenth of a penny and there are 16+ billion shares in circulation with many many more to come.

All the while SS draws a significant salary plus benefits whilst there is little chance of returning share holder value.

better to be thought a fool than speak up and remove all doubt

more completely unsubstantiated comments ocelot ? Again I very much hope you don't convince some mug to invest with your pie in the sky, unsubstantiated tripe

SS has sounded positive and enthusiastic from day one. Better to remain silent and be thought a fool....

could it involve a placement?

Define Troll TH2? Someone who keeps posting unsubstantiated claims, no basis of fact whatsoever in order to influence people one way or the other, to their own benefit?

Now then - how many times have you posted this will hit 0.5p soon. Zak Mir predicted 0.9p soon, catch the rocket, get the train, massive rerate coming and so forth. In fact you have zero credibility and I hope you don't manage to mug people into investing into what becomes increasing more like a ponzi scheme every day. If you don't understand the meaning of that word - look it up. It's looking quite accurate at the moment

Once upon a time there was a gusher at gatwick. The biggest onshore oil play since Wytch farm. Oh, hang on a minute.....

you're having a laugh

Ocelot - to take advantage of a more favourable environment for extraction and production of hydrocarbons, one has to have some.

"I consider UKOG to be ideas-rich, projects-rich, cash-poor, but with very substantial potential, all the more so since the SoS's recent decision in favour of the Loxley appeal."

You must be getting paid to write this tripe all day every day

HHIAN - thanks, some debate at least. I personally have zero confidence in the copmany to provide success at any of these but thanks

no sorry you don't get off that easy - you're on here 24/7 with your rampathon, one way rampathon pushing every possible news article hoping to influence people coming in. Fact is you can't actually face scrutiny and your last answer proves it - why don't you act like you have a brain and explain why the news article you posted on this chat board about UKOG has any relevance whatsoever? You might as well have put the latest NASCAR results up. It's not just a place for you to unilaterally post ramptastic one way tosh. People would have more respect if you actually tried to embrace sensible argument on it - so again - how does the news you posted impact UKOG?

you still aren't answering the question of how this news is in any way relevant to the fortunes of UKOG. If you put yourself on a pedestal, continually posting any piece of HC news here - you should at least have the decency of balls to explain why you think this news is in any way related to the fortunes of the company in quesiton which is UKOG> We don't have any gas. Very very little oil and no short, medium or long term prospects of having either. So how can this be any relevance please?

no it doesn't - you won't answer the question - how is it relevant to UKOG? How will it change anything please? don't be defensive

doesn't matter where you got it. Lets say Russia cuts off the gas right now - now. what can UKOG do about it? How much gas can we magically pump from the ground? How much oil? NADA. Big fat nothing. A total irrelevance to UKOG. This oil price bull run has been live for sometime and it's had zero impact on this share. You're simply spouting twaddle, multiple times, day after day.

how is this relevant to UKOG? So much chat, rampathon and still tenths of a penny

Ocelot - that's a piffling amount of shares trading hands consudering the total shares in circulation.

However - maybe you could have a think why this is happening and why the price is down 4% ? Can't be because of the POO as we don't have any - so what else could be afoot i wonder.

How many shares will be in circulation by the end of July ??

OK fair enough. I believe it to be trading at it's fair value as priced by the market. close to a tenth of a penny. Without substantial increase in sales this can't go up.

is it oversold do you think?