Member Info for guzzler1962

I think you'll find my ranting on TG started after the Argentina RNSs.
Stating they were badly written and confusing didn't sit well with the cult.
It didn't seem to enthuse the market either since that was the start of the slide.
But now that you have decided to raise your head above the parapet, I'd love to hear your thoughts on the breakdown of upcoming revenues.
What are you expecting from Mexico and Argentina?
I'm assuming you're aware of the downloads?
You can respond here or TG ;)

When you buy (invest) into AIM stocks you immediately become responsible for managing your portfolio.
Protecting your stake should be your main priority.
If that means locking in profit, or taking out initial stake as a stock tanks, then that surely that's the correct thing to do?
In less than 1 year this stock has gone from 0.21 to 0.70.
Retraced to 0.28, back up to 0.50 and now back to 0.29.
It's impossible to catch the bottom and top every time.
But it has been possible to increase your holdings (if you want) or to significantly derisk because of the swings.
I wish I'd managed my holding here better but that's my fault.
To do nothing of course, is another choice.
Is it the right choice?
Time will tell I suppose.

I checked my transaction history this weekend.
I've held MOS since last July.
Lowest purchase 0.22p, highest 0.64p.
At one point my average had grown to 0.50p.
Having got it down to 0.40 by selling some (not all)and rebuying I was promptly called a trader.
My average is now mid 0.3s and I hold more now than I have ever held.
Yet here I am, a trader apparently (as if that's some kind of insult) when in fact what I am is a LTH who has taken off the rose tinted glasses with regard to the BOD.

Very strange.
Didn't you highlight MOS as the stock of 2022?
Wasn't your opinion at 0.47 to hold?
At 0.37 to buy?
Now it's to sell? After 8 weeks at 0.30?
Interesting:)))))

Imagine wanting to make my money back pmsl
Pretty sure I was being preached to by the "investors" that selling at 0.5 and above would see me missing the boat.
That was 7 months ago :)))))

No negative posts today and the Ask drops below 0.29.
Not sure who gets the blame for that?
Anyway, it didn't stay below 0.29 long before buyers took them.
Added, before it went NT at 0.29.
C,Mon Epstein give us a spike.

#COYG https://t.co/Q4VYHgn56N #mos #nft #comingsoon https://t.co/p9WioMzuSk

Steve_d

You've been calling 0.25 for 8 weeks.
Whilst I agree if the Gfin deal isn't well received we could take a hit, just plucking a number out of thin air for a low entry is poor form.
So news will probably be the factor.
Since the Placing any time the Ask has dropped below 0.29 it's quickly bought up.
I see it being the same if they drop it for no reason.

Just to reiterate, I hold both views.
I bought more recently and considering adding again.
Spread currently is tight and a decent RNS would see my purchase profitable.
Patience required is exactly right, simply because the overhang needs to be churned.
Will the overhang be gone before upcoming results?
But my eyes are wide open now since the games prior to the Placing have been exposed.
As for Gfin, a delayed trade of £32K printed yesterday at 52 week low.
I'm guessing a buy which might point to news is close and might get us moving.

City,

It's occurred to me that we rushed a Placing through to get into bed with a Company that perhaps isn't the most honourable.
They shafted their shareholders and now dragging their heels (if it is down to them) on a JV that has resulted in MOS investment down 20%.

Gfin now at 52 week low ffs.
But at least we now know when Epstein states "shortly" in a RNS he doesn't mean within 8 weeks.
Thank fook he didn't say imminently.
MOS investment currently sitting at circa £50K loss.
Market not liking the uncertainty would be my guess.
So hurry up and get this deal announced!

Disciple,

If the last figures you saw were £14K, and you think 200% increase means a new figure of £28K, you may need to recalculate :))))
Since we are discussing upcoming revenue figures (I admit I'm a tad nervous) it's probably best to point out a decent chunk of the $720K contract win should be included this time around.

Nonsense I know, but 1 share printed in GFIN.
Are we close to getting the details of this JV?

It's been 8 weeks today since that awful placing.
Pointless even trying to defend it.
You can't defend the indefensible.
Trust in the BOD has gone. (for me)
The rhetoric leading up to end of Q1 when warrants expired was obviously an attempt to get them exercised.
AIM is sentiment driven and ME killed it.
It's been a frustrating 2 months, especially considering no further info on Gfin or Jio.
However, the SP surprisingly has stayed stable for 2 months.
Difficult to buy below 0.29.
So signs or hints of a recovery are needed.
Timing is all important.
And I think we are beginning to see the signs.
So regardless of your viewpoints, positive or negative (I've a foot in both camps believe it or not) I think there's money to be made from here.
I've been adding. Took some last week at 0.29 and had some yesterday and today a tad under 0.3.

Too many shares in issue is the new deramp I see.
Any old chestnut used to distract away from a positive Tr1 RNS.
Bunch of c#nts.
Have a look at how many shares in issue at 88e, a company that hasn't delivered anything, then tell me the Mcap.

"All he's done is topped up his savings account"......
5% prior to the dilution was 117M shares.
To maintain that threshold he's had to increase to 164M shares.
47M over 2 months at around 0.3p.
Approximately £140K.
Give some credit ffs because without his backing I'd dread to think what the SP would be.

24 million shares offloaded within 90 minutes this morning.
Spread was tight just prior to the selling and I almost bought more.
So thankful I didn't get caught and impressed we managed to stay above 0.3.
Small mercies.

None.
A shameless, baseless ramp.

So the markets are reliant on furlough money?
There's some absolute sh##e posted on here to excuse why the SP isn't through the roof.

Revenue from NFTs (if any) won't be known for months probably.
I have no idea why people think just because NFTs are mentioned the Mcap should substantially increase?
They are 'on trend' I suppose.
Even 2 self proclaimed trading guru's are apparently getting in on the act, which probably tells a story in itself.