Member Info for guzzler1962

Someone has to ask so it may as well be me.
If the Genesis whitelist sold out within 72 hours at $50 each, and the Genesis public drop at $100 didn't sell because too expensive, why are we offering a 20% discount on the whitelist squad drop?
The whitelist was responsible for 90% of the Genesis revenue.

Won their quarter final first leg (away) tonight :)

Sophie

Remember when you asked the question at the beginning of September why there might be a need for a Placing?
Perhaps you need to check the answers given, especially mine ;)

So it's rubbish that in the last 2 weeks, Burton has participated in 2 placings?
1 he put in £11K.
The other he put in £100K.
1 is on the cusp of announcing new contracts (us) the other is a total car crash with desperate times ahead.
Explain to me what message that sends out to MOS shareholders.

Sam
Getting a bit old now tbh, 60 is probably too old for a street fight but I doubt I'd back down.

Are you really defending someone who has overseen 2 x 33% discounted placings in 7 months (with warrants), didn't attempt to maintain his percentage whilst sitting next to his boss that's saying this is going to be a £100M Mcao company?
£11K he contributed, yet today he supported DVRG with £100K ffs.
Are you really defending him?
Wake the fook up!!!

Steve_d

I'm very critical of the BOD and how this has played out.
Epstein posting rocket emojis on twitter is something I'm very much against.
Guess who was the first ever CEO I became aware of ramping on twitter? Gerald Brandon of DVRG!
It rarely ends well.
You'd think Burton with his experience would advise against such nonsense.
I wonder what price Burton could have got the recent placing away at if the BOD had really supported it and spoken to existing holders?
Seems they preferred to bend to Peterhouse clients wishes than protect LTHs.
However, even I can see that if any money is going to be made from MOS its going to be made in the coming weeks.
Caveats apply of course.
Pump and dump crew still lingering, warrants at 0.3, moot reaction to new contracts perhaps.
But sentiment appears to have changed.
Rampy? Yes.
But that's what AIM is all about.
Spare a thought for those that need to recoup losses, those of us that see both sides of the coin, you're not doing us any favours.

The guy that keeps telling us he has decades of experience.
Knows his onions. Understands the market blah blah blah.
Take a look at DVRG.
70% down in 6 months and a massive Placing at 20% discount.
70+ percent extra shares with warrants.
But here's the good part.
He made no attempt to maintain his percentage shareholding in MOS.
As we know, City has stumped up approximately £200K since March in an attempt to stay near 5%.
Today, Burton threw £100K at the dog DVRG.
What a .......(insert your own adjective).

Hepseal

Squad of 31 announced.
World Cup squad is maximum 26.
Deadline November 13th for World Cup.
2 friendly games prior to Qatar.

I'm invested.
You can challenge anything I've said regarding what has occurred here over the last 12 months.
You can challenge my assessment of yesterday's RNS too if you like.

Wet wipes eh?
And the classic deramping, want in cheaper claim.
Utterly pathetic response but I didn't expect any different to be honest.
There were investors that would have used the June revenue figure as a benchmark for growing revenue.
$243K with the football season just about to kick off. And a World Cup thrown in too.
$750K easy for the next 3 months without any NFTs.
But pointing out yesterday's figures are disappointing is something those investors would like to sweep under the carpet.
And then there is the Genesis NFTs.
According to Carr365365 the whitelist brought in $56K.
Which means about 70 (if we are lucky) Genesis NFTs sold.
It's not good enough, nowhere near good enough.
Buy if insulting those that highlight these things make you feel better then well done you.

Why does the RNS say the NFT price rose to $100 from 3pm Monday Mexico time?
Isn't that incorrect?
Surely it was 3pm our time?
And why release the RNS now?
Why not wait until more Genesis NFTs were sold?
They've just highlighted that the football mad Mexicans weren't snapping them up at 100 bucks.
Very very disappointed:(

Spin it any way you like, but using the official revenue figure of $243K for June and the official $620K figure for the 3 months since, we see an average monthly figure of $207K.
Which equates to 15% down on the June revenue.
Further to this, there's an unofficial figure of $56K revenue for the whitelist sell out.
Which means out of 1000 NFTs available since 3pm yesterday at $100, less than 100 have been sold.
Even worse, 3 hours before releasing the RNS, Epstein put out another desperate (or disingenuous)Tweet to ramp in buyers.

jemgee,

IGS contribution is a big unknown. How much of the $720 did we get and when did we get it.
Biggest shareholder was adamant we didn't get the majority of it until after June.
It was often debated here.
If he is correct the $620K figure includes that revenue.
Then we have the revenue from the extended contract.
Again we don't know how much.
But, if he is correct, this revenue isn't backloaded so 3 months worth is also included in the $620K.
Basically the figures are dire considering we hit $243K in June which is not during the football season.
Exponential affiliate revenue growth is what Epstein promised.
What is clear is that revenue alone won't increase the Mcap.
We need big contracts, with guaranteed revenue and lots of desirable NFT drops that actually sell out.

June revenue jumped up to $243K.
Personally I thought it was because of IGS contract and would have explained the hike.
I was told by our biggest shareholder that wasn't the case.
Who am I to argue?

June revenue $243K.
According to our biggest shareholder (via NB) that didn't include the IGS revenue from the 1st contract.
Also, the 2nd bigger IGS contract isn't backloaded apparently.
So average monthly revenue has fallen to $207, down from the June figure, and the new figures include IGS revenue.
Someone explain to me why they aren't in excess of $250K per month?
Of course, we can't verify which arm contributes revenue amount because they won't break it down.
Add to that they've just announced the drop hasn't sold out and you can see why the brakes are still on.
Not the RNS I wanted.

Nope

I suppose if some think Epstein is bad, take a look at Carl Esprey of CGO.
Obviously the negative points go unmentioned of course;)

NFTs are now the priority.
He publicly stated it.
Last year he claimed MOS would be a £100M Mcap company off the back of affiliate revenue and growth from their Apps.
It's why we all invested.
Clearly he over promised.
Revenue does come in but not enough to boost the SP.
So he took a knee jerk reaction to JV and invest in Gfin.
We took a big hit and it didn't work.
So now it's NFTs.
An analogy could be an oil explorer targeting shale oil, failing to get it out the ground, so switch to conventional oil.
Priorities change if a target doesn't work.
For MOS to make decent money, and return shareholder value, they need regular NFT drops which are desirable.
He promised us up to 30 new contracts.
He employed two Agencies at a cost of £500K to get them signed.
He diluted us further to get them signed.
We are at a pivotal period.
An important Quarter.
World Cup fever and promised contracts.
Can Epstein deliver?

They've sold the 2000 on offer?