Member Info for guidfarr

Terrorwit is an agent of the board and/or a miserable investor. It benefits no shareholder to hold an illiquid private instrument without accountability.

Curiosity:

TerrorWit was Nigwit on ADVFN been around since 2021!

Just make a search and check him there!

hTtps://uk.advfn.com/forum/search?q=nigwit&thread_title=on&thread_symbol=on&index=posts&post_poster=on&post_post=on&offset=550

This means this man has witnessed a total collapse of Nanoco's stock price and he's still happy with management!?

Man I'm sorry for you - Nanoco's stock has gone down 90.31% just in the last 5 years and 98.02% since the beginning.

How can you witness such capital destruction and still support the board man!!? Its pathetic unless you are part of management! The destruction in shareholder value is absolutely absurd. This company still has 10 million now trading at less than half its market cap - I'm not going to let this board take it private so that they can do whatever the hell they want with the money without any accountability whatsoever!

TerrorWit - go screw yourself we will not allow Nanoco to be delisted.

Terrorwit is an agent of the board and/or a miserable investor. It benefits no shareholder to hold an illiquid private instrument without accountability.

Curiosity:

TerrorWit was Nigwit on ADVFN been around since 2021!

Just make a search and check him there!

hTtps://uk.advfn.com/forum/search?q=nigwit&thread_title=on&thread_symbol=on&index=posts&post_poster=on&post_post=on&offset=550

This means this man has witnessed a total collapse of Nanoco's stock price and he's still happy with management!?

Man I'm sorry for you - Nanoco's stock has gone down 90.31% just in the last 5 years and 98.02% since the beginning.

How can you witness such capital destruction and still support the board man!!? Its pathetic unless you are part of management! The destruction in shareholder value is absolutely absurd. This company still has 10 million now trading at less than half its market cap - I'm not going to let this board take it private so that they can do whatever the hell they want with the money without any accountability whatsoever!

How much does the fulfillment side with THG cost? You have to keep in mind this is very low margin business.

I find it hard to believe he's just a muppet. The way he defended them and the way he only posts about Nanoco makes me strongly believe he's connected to the board somewhat.

Terrorwit is an agent of the board and/or a miserable investor. It benefits no shareholder to hold an illiquid private instrument without accountability.

Curiosity:

TerrorWit was Nigwit on ADVFN been around since 2021!

Just make a search and check him there!

hTtps://uk.advfn.com/forum/search?q=nigwit&thread_title=on&thread_symbol=on&index=posts&post_poster=on&post_post=on&offset=550

This means this man has witnessed a total collapse of Nanoco's stock price and he's still happy with management!?

Man I'm sorry for you - Nanoco's stock has gone down 90.31% just in the last 5 years and 98.02% since the beginning.

How can you witness such capital destruction and still support the board man!!? Its pathetic unless you are part of management! The destruction in shareholder value is absolutely absurd. This company still has 10 million now trading at less than half its market cap - I'm not going to let this board take it private so that they can do whatever the hell they want with the money without any accountability whatsoever!

However you try to spin it, terrorwit, the board has backtracked today and been humiliated.

THEY DIDN'T EVEN DARE ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS OF THE DELISTING VOTE

That gives you a good clue that it was massively defeated.

nanoco will not be delisted now.

if the board wants a compromise, it can move the listing to aim. that would be acceptable to many shareholders. what is not acceptable is trying to force retail investors into an illiquid private company.

and if the board is foolish enough to come back with another delisting vote, it should understand this clearly: the next no-delisting campaign will be far more organised, far more visible, and far more aggressive.

i work in marketing. i know how to get a message out. i will use press releases, shareholder articles, share prophet submissions, direct shareholder contact, and, if necessary, obtain a copy of the shareholder register so retail investors can be organised into a united front.

there are also serious questions that now need answering.

was glass lewis genuinely acting in the best interests of nanoco shareholders when it recommended voting in favour of delisting?

what due diligence did it actually carry out?

and was glass lewis paid, directly or indirectly, by nanoco, its advisers, or any connected party in relation to that recommendation?

shareholders deserve to know whether this was a genuinely independent assessment, or simply board-friendly cover for a proposal that was always hostile to retail investors.

secondly, if the board attempts to use votes attached to the nanoco group plc employee benefit trust to force through delisting, then in my view that should trigger an immediate vote of no confidence in the board.

this delisting proposal makes no sense.

nanoco has a large cash balance. no debt. valuable ip. real assets. plenty of options. there are many ways to cut costs without destroying the public listing and trapping ordinary shareholders in a private, illiquid company.

this is not a distressed shell. this is not a broken microcap with no alternatives. this is a company with a dream balance sheet trying to remove public market accountability.

that is why this proposal is so offensive.

shareholders must not be bullied, misled or steamrolled into surrendering their rights.

JWL - vote defeated man - delisting defeating - they just didn't have the balls to announce by how much it was defeated - probably a lot!

This is so UNLIKE Nanoco - SBDS has net debt and the constitution of shareholders is very different too.

SBDS Silver Bullet Data Services has big net debt - not at all similar!

THEY DIDN'T EVEN DARE ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS OF THE DELISTING VOTE - IS THAT EVEN LEGAL? CAN WE OBLIGE THEM TO PUBLISH IT?

however you try to spin it, terrorwit, the board has backtracked today and been humiliated.

nanoco will not be delisted now.

if the board wants a compromise, it can move the listing to aim. that would be acceptable to many shareholders. what is not acceptable is trying to force retail investors into an illiquid private company.

and if the board is foolish enough to come back with another delisting vote, it should understand this clearly: the next no-delisting campaign will be far more organised, far more visible, and far more aggressive.

i work in marketing. i know how to get a message out. i will use press releases, shareholder articles, share prophet submissions, direct shareholder contact, and, if necessary, obtain a copy of the shareholder register so retail investors can be organised into a united front.

there are also serious questions that now need answering.

was glass lewis genuinely acting in the best interests of nanoco shareholders when it recommended voting in favour of delisting?

what due diligence did it actually carry out?

and was glass lewis paid, directly or indirectly, by nanoco, its advisers, or any connected party in relation to that recommendation?

shareholders deserve to know whether this was a genuinely independent assessment, or simply board-friendly cover for a proposal that was always hostile to retail investors.

secondly, if the board attempts to use votes attached to the nanoco group plc employee benefit trust to force through delisting, then in my view that should trigger an immediate vote of no confidence in the board.

this delisting proposal makes no sense.

nanoco has a large cash balance. no debt. valuable ip. real assets. plenty of options. there are many ways to cut costs without destroying the public listing and trapping ordinary shareholders in a private, illiquid company.

this is not a distressed shell. this is not a broken microcap with no alternatives. this is a company with a dream balance sheet trying to remove public market accountability.

that is why this proposal is so offensive.

shareholders must not be bullied, misled or steamrolled into surrendering their rights.

however you try to spin it, terrorwit, the board has backtracked today and been humiliated.

nanoco will not be delisted now.

if the board wants a compromise, it can move the listing to aim. that would be acceptable to many shareholders. what is not acceptable is trying to force retail investors into an illiquid private company.

and if the board is foolish enough to come back with another delisting vote, it should understand this clearly: the next no-delisting campaign will be far more organised, far more visible, and far more aggressive.

i work in marketing. i know how to get a message out. i will use press releases, shareholder articles, ************* submissions, direct shareholder contact, and, if necessary, obtain a copy of the shareholder register so retail investors can be organised into a united front.

there are also serious questions that now need answering.

was glass lewis genuinely acting in the best interests of nanoco shareholders when it recommended voting in favour of delisting?

what due diligence did it actually carry out?

and was glass lewis paid, directly or indirectly, by nanoco, its advisers, or any connected party in relation to that recommendation?

shareholders deserve to know whether this was a genuinely independent assessment, or simply board-friendly cover for a proposal that was always hostile to retail investors.

secondly, if the board attempts to use votes attached to the nanoco group plc employee benefit trust to force through delisting, then in my view that should trigger an immediate vote of no confidence in the board.

this delisting proposal makes no sense.

nanoco has a large cash balance. no debt. valuable ip. real assets. plenty of options. there are many ways to cut costs without destroying the public listing and trapping ordinary shareholders in a private, illiquid company.

this is not a distressed shell. this is not a broken microcap with no alternatives. this is a company with a dream balance sheet trying to remove public market accountability.

that is why this proposal is so offensive.

shareholders must not be bullied, misled or steamrolled into surrendering their rights.

TerrorWit you are an agent of the board so people better always keep that in mind when conversing with you. You are not conversing with a normal 'investor' but with someone with close connections to Nanoco's management. A delisting is off the card - they just didn't say the actual words to avoid humiliation. They don't even have the balls to tell us how the exact vote outcome. I took advantage of today to add!

People's anger is understandable. Due to the board's foolish 'delisting' proposal they have more than halved the stock price. We will not accept delisting under any circumstance but we will accept an AIM listing.

Over 18 million shares traded today - that's great to flush out the quick day traders, the gains here will be more slow. Hopefully the board will realise that their only realistic option is to downlist to AIM. We will not allow it to be delisted.

Haha now that is a good one regarding Laura. I actually added just now. The day traders need to be squeezed out and she's one of them.

Immediate gratification TerrorWith? Have you checked the stock price over the last 5 years? It is a train wreck.

Yes, in for a long wait - the board have done a lot of damage here.

Its a tough business with tight margins getting destroyed by the government's ridiculous high national living wage of £12.71. Paying £12.71 as a minimum to every single worker plus hiked national insurance is tough to breakeven.

TerrorWit what did the board of directors tell you during your belte this morning. Tell us the exact words. The board of directors have done a lot of damage here, it will take time to recover. The delisting motion has been defeated plain and simple - it has been defeated so much that the board doesn't even dare publish the numbers.