Member Info for guidfarr

No retail investors are being tricked into thinking that going private is good for them when its blatantly obvious it isn't.

That note of yesterday was maliciously designed to sway undecided uninformed, unsophisticated investors to vote for the delisting.

Hargreaves sent out an e-mail yesterday. Ironically the weak holders are selling and people like me are buying and we are all going to vote against this.

No one in his right mind would vote for the delisting except of course for the directors who came up with the foolish idea. The market has already told you what they think about the delisting - as soon as they announced it the market cap was cut in half with the stock now trading at half its cash balance. The people who want this are indifferent bastards. They don't care that 90% plus of shareholders are retail and that we value a public listing. They want it private so that they can spend the cash without accountability. The company is now in a position where it doesn't care about retail shareholders - they reason they now have the cash to last them a few years. VOTE NO. GET THIS DEFEATED AND SEE THE STOCK PRICE POTENTIALLY RALLY 50% AS PEOPLE REALISE IT WILL STAY LISTED.

The directors seem to have a pathetic 1.5% between them - they have no say whatsoever in whether the company goes private so they are now trying to trick naive' or undecided uneducated shareholders. They tell them that they will still be able to trade their shares using the matched-bargain facility - good luck with that - the liquidity will be inexistent - not to mention that they will withdraw this facility at some point.

If they really want to reduce expenses they should list it on AIM and slash their costs - no one should be employed if they aren't providing tangible value. We probably need a change of management.

I heard 'TerrorWit' on the LSD board is actually Liam!

Formally known as Gigawit and NigWit!

hTtps://www.nanocotechnologies.com/about/board-of-directors/

THIS IS THE GUY TELLING YOU THAT DELISTING IS OKAY AND THAT YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR IT.

Nanoco shareholders - vote NO to delisting

Nanoco has announced that Glass Lewis recommends voting FOR the delisting resolution. That does not change the reality for ordinary shareholders. The stock is now trading at approximately half the cash balance they have!

This is still your company. The board only owns around 1.36% of the shares, yet it is asking shareholders to remove Nanoco from the public market. The delisting and re-registration need at least 75% of the votes cast, so retail shareholders can stop this if they actually vote.

Do not be passive. If you oppose delisting, vote AGAINST both resolutions immediately.

If you hold through Hargreaves Lansdown, Interactive Investor, AJ Bell, Barclays, Halifax, ii, Freetrade or another nominee platform, check your voting deadline now. Nanoco itself says platform deadlines are likely to be significantly earlier than the official proxy deadline of 10.30 a.m. on 17 June 2026.

Important: if you are buying Nanoco shares because you believe the delisting should be defeated, do not assume your vote will automatically count. Nanoco’s circular says shareholders must be on the company’s register at 6.00 p.m. on 17 June 2026 to vote, and platform deadlines may be earlier. Buy only if you understand the risks, then contact your broker/platform immediately and ask how to vote AGAINST the delisting.

The board wants to remove the public listing and leave shareholders relying on a matched bargain facility. That is not the same as a proper public market. Liquidity may be far worse. Once delisted, retail shareholders could be trapped in an illiquid private company.

This is not about Glass Lewis. This is about whether ordinary shareholders want to keep the right to trade Nanoco shares on the London Stock Exchange.

Vote NO.

Tell other shareholders.

Do not let apathy hand the board a 75% vote.

The presentation says https://www.enquest.com/fileadmin/content/press_release_pdfs/2026/Malaysia_FOA_-_Investor_Deck_vF.pdf $5 boe which would make it look very cheap. I was initially taken aback by the purchase cost but if its at $5 boe!!

All we have is the stock price so a rally back to reflect the case balance would be a good start for us. Directors don't care about shareholders here. They know they have 10 million and they know it will last them a few years. So they want to delist to remove accountability and not be bothered to inform shareholders about what they're doing (or not doing!!). With a private company you won't know anything about what's happening. But that's what they want. They just want to be able to spend our money as they please - no questions asked thank you! IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT FOR A MINUTE YOU WILL REALISE THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS WHEN THIS COMPANY IS 90%+ OWNED BY RETAIL - WHAT CHEEK!!?? It is not their money to spend, it is our money! If they want to reduce the cash burn they can list it on AIM and reduce any staff not directly contributing. They can also lower salaries and seek a buyer - the salaries need to be aligned with the value creation - as for a prospective buyer it is all about the price. There are 10 million in the company's balance sheet - we as shareholders want accountability and do not want them to spend it needlessly.

We are small retail investors. The only way we can make a difference and block this is by joining up. Of course this doesn't suit you because you are part of management. This company is owned 90% by retail and we didn't buy in into a private company.

Silver Bullet has net debt, this one has 10 million cash - can't even compare them. I bought this after the delisting crash. No one is going to buy Silver Bullet 'rationally' now.

Why don't you ask Glass Lewis to send you their reasoning and publish it here if you get a reply. Is Glass Lewis really independent or does it get 'sponsored' to issue its opinion? Delisting saves money in principle but this company is mainly owned by retail and they've just destroyed more than half the market cap by just announcing the delisting. The market cap itself was an 'asset' to the company and to shareholders. They have no business delisting it - if they wanted to save move they should have moved it to AIM.

Cable Car have been hostile of the board and had some grievances so they will likely be voting against. Milkwood likewise. There are some other important shareholders until nominees who also had clashes. It is shocking that the board wants people to vote for this when they know that 90%+ of their investors are retail.

And naive/unsophisticated undecided investors who feel nervous but are undecided:

'Subsequent to any cancellation, Shareholders will continue to be able to trade in Ordinary Shares through the company's Matched Bargain Facility.'

OH BUT REALLY!? YOU TRY TO USE THE MATCHED BARGAIN FACILITY AND SEE WHAT THAT GETS YOU. THE LIQUIDITY WILL BE ALMOST INEXISTENT. THIS IS DESIGNED TO MAKE NAIVE/UNINFORMED/UNSOPHISTICATE PEOPLE INTO THINKING THAT IT IS OK - WE CAN STILL EXIT IF YOU NEED TO. YEAH RIGHT. IF THIS BUNCH OF JOKERS WANT LOWER COSTS THEY CAN LIST IT ON AIM. ONCE DELISTED THERE WILL BE NO TRANSPARENCY AND THIS BUNCH WILL KEEP SUCKING THE COMPANY DRY.

Trying to pass it with treachery I give you that BUT IT WON'T PASS.

Nanoco Group PLC Employee Benefit Trust holds 6.7% - it is highly unethical for the board to use these votes to vote for delisting. Those votes have been bought from the main market on behalf of the shareholders.

I find it appalling that they've issued this 'Glass Lewis' note. Glass Lewis should be reported to the FCA for issuing this note to deceive naive shareholders into thinking that going private is good for them. The stock price has more than halved since delisting announcement - how is that good for shareholders!!?

Institutional investor have clashed with these bunch of jokers before and they will likely vote against.

I find it appalling that they've issued this 'Glass Lewis' note. Glass Lewis should be reported to the FCA for issuing this note to deceive naive shareholders into thinking that going private is good for them.

'The Board remains confident that cancellation of the listing is the right course of action to reduce costs and preserve capital as we focus on delivering value for shareholders.'

DELIVERING VALUE FOR SHAREHOLDERS LOL YOU JUST HAVE TO CHECK THE STOCK PRICE OVER 5 YEARS TO SEE WHAT THESE JOKERS HAVE DELIVERED FOR SHAREHOLDERS. PRESERVING VALUE LOL - AS SOON AS THIS DELISTING WAS ANNOUNCED THE STOCK PRICE SLASHED IN HALF. THE BEST WAY TO PRESERVE VALUE IS TO VOTE AGAINST. VOTING AGAINST MIGHT GET THE STOCK PRICE TO RECOVER A BIT.

'Subsequent to any cancellation, Shareholders will continue to be able to trade in Ordinary Shares through the company's Matched Bargain Facility.'

OH BUT REALLY!? YOU TRY TO USE THE MATCHED BARGAIN FACILITY AND SEE WHAT THAT GETS YOU. THE LIQUIDITY WILL BE ALMOST INEXISTENT. THIS IS DESIGNED TO MAKE NAIVE/UNINFORMED/UNSOPHISTICATE PEOPLE INTO THINKING THAT IT IS OK - WE CAN STILL EXIT IF YOU NEED TO. YEAH RIGHT. IF THIS BUNCH OF JOKERS WANT LOWER COSTS THEY CAN LIST IT ON AIM. ONCE DELISTED THERE WILL BE NO TRANSPARENCY AND THIS BUNCH WILL KEEP SUCKING THE COMPANY DRY.

It takes a few days after buying for you to be able to vote. E-mail them. Hargreaves on mine shows in the corporate/upcoming meetings sections.

They won't resign - the gravy train is too appetising. Do you really think they'll find such nice jobs easily??

Yes its designed to sway naive/inexperienced investors.

'Subsequent to any cancellation, Shareholders will continue to be able to trade in Ordinary Shares through the company's Matched Bargain Facility.'

The absolute gall of saying that!!! They don't tell them that once delisted it will be highly illiquid. They didn't tell them that the price has halved since the announcement!! CRIMINALS.

Nanoco holders: vote NO to delisting.

Glass Lewis backing the board does not make delisting good for retail shareholders.

The vote needs 75% of votes cast, not 75% of all shareholders. That means apathy helps the board.

If you hold through HL, ii, AJ Bell, Barclays, Halifax, Freetrade or another platform, check your voting deadline now. Platform deadlines may be earlier than Nanoco’s official 10.30 a.m. 17 June 2026 proxy deadline.

If you are buying shares and want to vote against, do not assume your vote will count automatically. You need to be eligible and your platform must process the vote in time. Contact your broker immediately after purchase and ask to vote AGAINST both delisting resolutions.

Retail shareholders can stop this - but only if they vote.

VOTE NO.

BUY MORE SHARES AND VOTE AGAINST. ANSWER THEIR CALL. THEN ONCE THIS IS VOTED AGAINST SEE A DOUBLING OF THE STOCK PRICE.

I see the board are becoming desperate with this 'Glass Lewis recommends voting for delisting resolution' Don't be fooled! Delisting is not in your interest!

To see if the board are really competent just go on google and type nanoco group share price on the 'max' timeframe. The return is an outrageous 97.95% loss of investor funds - this stock used to trade over 150p. To see what the market thinks about the board's proposal see how the stock price crashed by over 50% on the news of the delisting vote. WHAT THEY HAVE DELIVERED IS MISERY.

Conclusion: The current board of directors cannot be trusted to deliver for shareholders. VOTE NO. DON'T LET THEM DELIST. ONCE DELISTED YOU WILL BE AT THEIR MERCY. If they want lower costs they should list it on AIM with much lower fees. This company is mainly owned by retail investors and the current board of directors have no right to take it private and make it very difficult for people to trade the stock (without getting shafted).

A DELISTING WILL REQUIRE A VOTE OF 75 PER CENT OF THE VOTES AT THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING. UNLIKE MOST OTHER LISTED COMPANIES THIS COMPANY IS VASTLY OWNED BY RETAIL SHAREHOLDERS AND NO ONE HAS EXPRESSED CONSENT FOR THE DELISTING EXCEPT FOR THE DIRECTORS WHO OWN A MINISCULE HOLDING. THOSE JOKERS HAVE NO CARDS. WE HAVE MORE CONTROL ON WHETHER THIS COMPANY STAYS LISTED THAN WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK YOU HAVE. YOUR REAL ENEMY IS INDIFFERENCE. IF YOU DON'T VOTE YOU WILL PLAY IN YOUR HANDS BECAUSE THEY THE COMPANY WILL USE THE VOTES OF THE SHARES THEY'VE BOUGHT FOR THE Nanoco Group PLC Employee Benefit Trust TO VOTE FOR THE DELISTING. (EVEN IF THIS IS UNETHICAL TO SAY THE LEAST AS THESE VOTES ARE NOT THEIRS FOR THEM TO CAST!)

Make sure to Vote no if you value your money. A no vote could potentially double the stock price. I know its not much comfort for a long term holder but its better than current levels.

For us retail shareholders it is critical to vote against this resolution. Directors are relying on the fact that not many shareholders will bother to vote!

HOW TO VOTE NO - ACT NOW! DIRECTORS ARE RELYING ON THE FACT THAT MANY PEOPLE WON'T BOTHER TO VOTE AND WILL PROBABLY USE THE SHARES THEY BOUGHT (WITH YOUR MONEY!) TO VOTE FOR THE DELISTING. Nanoco Group Sponsored Employee Benefit Trust own 6.93%. It will be vile for the directors to use this stake to vote for the delisting but these people don't have any conscience.

For Hargreaves Lansdown - you need to log in

'However, this doesn't stop you from partaking or voting in any future AGMs on any of the shares that you hold. If you'd like to attend an AGM or vote on a company’s shares that you hold, you can do so once logged into your account through our website by clicking on the View shareholder meetings link underneath your secure messages.

From here, you will be able to see all upcoming shareholder meetings for companies in which you own shares and submit a vote on the proposals or request to attend an u

If they downlist to AIM the expense would be much less and we would preserver a listing. VOTE NO. Get these jokers to do what shareholders ask.