Member Info for grouchomarx

Always the negative Nelly, and without reason. Barclays hasn’t sold but their holding percentage decreased because of: “ Change in Issued Share Capital”.

You’re welcome.

Really liked the webinar, we’re definitely on the right track.
It is clear to see that Jason knows the other panel members very well.
Also really liked Jason positivity and energy and the chemistry between him and the others.
Very clever guy imo and impressed.

Now, let’s close some deals!

Wrong (again). Have been investing >30 years. “USED to.... “ thus not recently. Why not recently? I make it a habit to contact CEO’s of the companies I’m invested in on a regular basis. As I do with LSAI.

Personally I would not invest in any company whose directors I don’t trust.
See no rationale in trusting my money to incompetent and/or untrustworthy people?

You do though. Why? You’ve 41 years of experience. Surely there must be better places to invest your time and money in?

A very telling answer. You haven’t. Thought so.

Aerial- You being a serious investor: when is the last time you’ve contacted the company? Had a phone call with the CEO or something alike? Or are you just a keyboard-hero?

I never stop learning.
And I haven’t said that anything said on this board is affecting what the company is doing, that would be absurd.
I’m sure though that a very thinly traded share price is effected by repetitive negativity.

You’re right about one thing though: I’m not a serious investor. LOL.

The repetitive talks about the past. Yes, we know about the war, time to move on and look ahead!

Yeah Rob, right.

Some people just don’t have what it takes to be an investor. Can’t accept sometimes things do not exactly turn out the way they imagined.

Must be the same people while seeing someone walk on water, commenting: “he can’t swim”.

Probably not referring to me, but our volume is (mostly) anemic. So, yes, being negative (or positive) does effect the share price. But, dream on.

Hi Kevin,

Great advice, that the naysayers on this board should take to heart!

If you're not happy: sell, walk away and move on.

Sorry LSAI hasn't worked out for you, but that's life (a shame though that took 7 years).

I'm VERY, VERY positive about LSAI's prospects and I think it can tenbag easily.

But, then again, maybe I'll be joining the naysayers one day. :)

Won't be long though. I'll just take it up to the chin, take my losses and will find other opportunities.

Good Luck Kevin and happy investing!

we're = were

Nothing to be done about that other than just sitting it out.

It has been dead money and kind of boring, but the underluying business is doing well and prospects are great.
The share price doing nothing doesn't change that.

Most money I've made shares we're always the unloved and often boring ones, bottoming for quite some time.

If those shares take off, they really do take off!

Just to pass time, add some fun and to increase my future profits I'll add.

BOL.

It's kind of funny though. :)

I'm not worried. Not worried at all. Come on Mark show us the contracts!

Added.

We can get to 4.6p again. The company is unknown. That’ll change. And if it does, share price will increase fast.

Hm. Too bad, just checked a little too late as I would very much like to add @0.45 p.

So unloved and/or unknown, yet having all the right ingredients to become a tenbagger at least.

Yes, I’d like to add @0.45 p.

This going to be our best quarter ever and I do expect US client(s) to sign this year (this month?).

Source: https://lnkd.in/exy8jnE

Can LS give that insight?

I’ve tried to transcript part of a recent conversation between Kristina Lutz and Christy Davies (Head of product LS).
Tried to because English is not my mother language.

Anyway, Christy Davies:

“And what we do is, we have a proprietary technology, we’re using a model that’s build of actual first party data and real SPK data, where we know that it is valid location data.

We’ve build a model that we can actually predict what this accuracy is and through that we also know all of these coordinates for Apples new approximate location (!, Groucho).

So we can quickly flag those devices that actually probably shouldn’t be in the audience and place them in, what we call, an insufficient bucket (!, Groucho).

So yeah, it’s definitely something marked as really you should be keen on. And again, it comes back to this thing that you’re buying a list of devices, effectively an audience segment, and you have no insight into the underlying data that has been used to build that.

And without a party like us you just not gonna have that insight and you don’t know how much you can actually trust that data”

When IOS 14 is launched people might opt for only sharing their approximate location (10 square miles). Advertisers might end up having paid for reaching out to a potential customer that was factually 3 miles away.

It would be great to know if someone had switched on “sharing approximate location”. To know if the location data can be trusted. For an advertiser to know that he got what he has paid for.

Can LS give that insight?

Added a few in the last minute (seconds).