Well result interpretation13 Aug 2018 10:51
Basically the rns is explaining there are two problems with this well;
1. Water-- In order to produce the gas the wellbore must be isolated vertically from the surrounding rocks so you only produce gas and not the stuff in the rocks below- in this case loads of water. This is done by cement plugs to isolate the formation you are interested in. In this case the plug has failed only allowing isolation of the top section of the gas column. Given time to rework this problem I would be confident the water problem can be solved.
2. Permeability.- The second problem is the fact that the top section of the gas column that they were able to test doesn't produce commercial quantities of gas naturally. This is due to the Torbifera formation, at this location, has insufficient natural rock fractures (at least in the section they were able to test) to allow the gas to flow to surface commercially. The solution, once the water plug problem is solved is to artificially increase the rock fractures, allowing the gas to flow at what will then hopefully be commercial rates. This process is mechanical stimulation or fraccing.
In time I would expect the water problem to be solved and an increased gas flow rate to follow the stimulation process. However, its unlikely to be a big producer in the long run but then it was never going to be company maker.
GLA