Member Info for GreenWolf

Nige - I agree it is highly unlikely we'll double our money but a 180 to 200p range for any takeout is probably reasonable. But I'm also with Trent on this - I won't have to worry about the price of shares by the time Brexit gets resolved!! GLA

Esquimo - why is it still a buy, until proven differently?

hobione - good to see you back here - out of interest how many did you buy previously?

Johnz - I do recall saying something about the extensive take up of shares at 0.02 by some......what's the saying at casinos - the house never loses. Rufus has returned no shareholder value to any of us yet continued to take his salary etc. That's his failing. Let's hope the past experience of our new main man can push us to where we need to be operationally. GLA

esquimo - apart from the two he released in September....in all seriousness we need some positive news after the interims.

aerial - I cant believe the BoD would make the same mistake twice either, but the three months post Interims certainly don't bode well. What is worse is we have promised so much as a company and delivered a business that in its current form, after exactly two years of producing washed coal, is haemorraging cash. That is the bigger issue, as burning the money now increases our debt, which we had none of before the CLF. These are the times when public company directors come into their own and hence my continued rant. It is far from rosy and until Rufus shows the market the silver lining in the cloud instead of just promising it, we aren't going to move on much. GLA

aerial - where have I said I think everyone's against me? The only people who seem to argue with me are you and Bigeye. What does that tell you? This all started because I took offense to something you directly said in one of your posts Bigeye has simply come out and stood up for you (your phraseology). If we want a debate, then perhaps you can give me some factual and tangible positives about our last interim results - if you bothered to actually read my posts, I did actually say something positive about them. And as for criticising - perhaps if we weren't losing £150k a month, weren't aporoaching two years behind planned breakeven and this wasnt by some margin the worst performing share in my portfolio, I might be slightly more positive.

aerial - perhaps I dont spend all my time reading everyone's posts but you are trying to justify an offensive post. I said in my first response to you that I don't condone such behaviour and perhaps your choice of wording in your post was particularly offensive to me personally. I'm quite happy to have the debate, but I'd like real and tangible positive facts from people about our performance and future. The BoD really needs to facilitate that. GW

aerial - why have others posts got anything to do with it? I read your comment and found it offensive and responded to it. I'm not moderating the whole board. And who am I meant to be "standing up" for? It's my investment, as a number of people keep telling me. Look, the simple fact is we're on our backside in terms of share price. We're all heavily under water on paper and the only (I'll avoid using capitals) way it's going to get moving is if the BoD restore faith in Edenville in the market. We've disagreed on this in the past but what is said on this or any other board has naff all to do with really influencing the share price. We can't keep getting the jam tomorrow messages as the market is clearly no longer interested in that - it has to be positive factual info from the BoD.

Ah, look. There it is. A number of quick posts to move the conversation on a different path. Aerial - with regards to discrediting people I simply don't understand why there is such a barrage of what borders on verbal abuse on here at times. Anything remotely negative, even factually based, is quickly leapt upon and shouted down. Personally we would have a far more balanced board if we had some really positive factual updates but we don't. I've emailed the company about Sinohydro (last week) and had no response yet, even an acknowledgement. I've explained ad infinitum why I moan about my investment here - we need regular factual updates from Rufus and then disgruntled investors like me and, way more importantly, the market will react accordingly, and we can all start recovering our hard earned money. There's no confidence in us as a company - only the BoD can change that. GLA

aerial - and the usual attempt to discredit me after one or two rather near the mark comments on mental health from yourself and bigeye. How can either of you joke about it? You've both shamed yourselves and now you're simply ganging up to turn it back on me to deflect the issue. As for not answering posts, sometimes idiotic questions don't even deserve a response, so perhaps there is a reason people don't always respond. Like you said, it's a shame we don't have the debates we used to have on here. I wonder why.

Bigeye - indeed I dont but making fun of mental health issues is simply wrong.

Ignorance is bliss. How terribly sad. I've seen you in a very different light this morning.

Bigeye - that really is quite an unbelievable post.

Bigeye - is your last post serious? Would you or anyone else come onto a public board and make fun of any physical disability, because mental health issues fall into exactly the same category. This is not about stitching people up, this is serious stuff and as you once said to me people discredit themselves on these forums. Both yourself and aerial seem to think it's right to make fun about these things. It's very wrong. I assume 10th October meant nothing to you then.

aerial - I am in no way condoning previous posts but to accuse someone of having "psychological issues" when you have no idea of their or perhaps their family's mental wellbeing is really not right. I know we try and have a laugh and a joke on here occasionally but the name calling at times is bordering on abuse. GW

Seanyj1 - you can't, is the straight answer. If you buy 9.5m shares at full ask (0.045) you should more or less halve your average though. GW

5eights - agree that 140 is a bit of a nut to crack. First resistance looks to be somewhere just under 139 so we need to close above that to push us on. Ex-divi on Friday so we'll have to expect a 2.6p drop. Looking a lot more comfortable here than two months ago though and Director buys when we're on an a slight uptrend are always good signs. GLA

bigeye - How can anyone deramp a share that is on its backside and all I post is facts that are readily available? Deramping is a scaremongering approach based on opinion as opposed to facts. The opposite to that of course is rampers - who post spurious non or semi-factual hope stories based on things that might happen, they have little or no response to the facts and hope that while they are averaging down in the background they can try and influence the share price just enough to get to a new average and sell out. As I've said before, there are also plenty of rumours of people getting paid to post on public forums. I don't post on a fair number of the shares in my portfolio but the one that is giving me the most financial grief on paper at least is Edenville. I get sick and tired of the patience / jam tomorrow messages from one or two on here and the BoD. The facts speak for themselves and they are reflected in our share price. Given the facts of where we are financially, the BoD needs to do far more to give positive messages to the market and then we might all see a bit more cheer on the share price. Opinion / beliefs etc etc in RNSs simply wont cut it. GLA

Oh well. Back to the name calling again is it? Perhaps put it this way - consider how long it has taken us to get to the present production figures and c£150k loss per month in our 6month interims. We have a CLF reserve that gives us c£2m or so more money once our current cash runs out. It doesnt take much to understand how critical this is now becoming. GLA