Sapan Gai, CCO at Sovereign Metals, discusses their superior graphite test results. Watch the video here.
Exactly CityWatcher. I havent made my mind up as I have been here too long. But this share is now a gamble not an investment.. there are plenty other gambles at the moment on AIM (with higher odds). I am waiting for TC to put his hand in his pocket again and show commitment here... that or sack his teaboy Ryan as a lamb to slaugher.
what shorters?? can you please provide link. Everything I see says no short positions over. The shareprice had tanked for reasons - TC and his failed plans
Nephew.. think he needs to put that on his LinkedIn page https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryan-stroulger-155795138/ . I assume he keeps this going as he might want another job one day LOL. TBH the job description should simply say TCs *****. Shocking state of affairs yes. I should have dumped the lot in November last year, but I had some faith that if I was going to loose money TC had enough skin in game to loose even more... I think thats incorrect now as he is squirrelling it away via Ryan and his wife in the hope none of us notice... I hope the FCA does.
Unfortunately TC is totally untrustworthy. As many have mentioned before he treats PMG as it is his private bank account. Clearly no one on the board including is puppet Ryan is asking any questions. I can only assume Ryan is a relative of some sort. There are so many examples, the farm, AUPEC £2.5M cash clear out (into his own pocket) are just the most recent. There should be an investigation, but this is AIM so assume nothing can be done.
Not to mention his wifes property and land for that matter also tied up
Tom is on here now isn't he (Buzz). I'm filtered so he cant read this. Why? Cost he also has a lot of money in this dumpster. Yes he is grabbing cash everyway and how. But clearly he is the only one ramping now out of pure desperation. See you at the bottom. I hope there are criminal investigations.
An imparement of goodwill? i.e. when a company decides to go and pay for something for more than its worth.. sounds crazy right. Not if that person you are paying is yourself as another company? As of June 2022 Aupec had £3m in the accounts this year it will be empty.. where did the money go TC and Ryans pockets? AUPEC has only 2 employees now TC and Ryan. All others are gone and retired.
An impairment of goodwill was recorded in the year of £2.2m (2021: £nil) relating to historic contracts held by the Group's benchmarking and economics subsidiary company, Aupec Limited. Aupec is undergoing a growth strategy change that will focus the company's offering to a more interactive, cloud-based system for clients. BUZZ/TC What is the status on your bank account growth strategy?!!!
Another companies house link https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC213858/officers . Who does/did AUPEC rent property from?
Stating the fact now. Its never been clearer for me for the first time today. Buzz/TC put some money in your pocket and show your commitment in the only way possible now. Buzz can't read this as he has filtered me.
Buzz you clearly work for the company. Are you TC? His wife? Please don't tell me you are the kiddie Ryan (another red flag there).
This share has cost me dearly. It has been a total waste of money and +10 years. Red flags were evident. Ofcource GPA is a write off the market knows this. If PMG cant make money during this gas and high oil price environment they never will. Yes we need the North Sea for energy security but as far as I am away enough capacity out there that can be milked before we get new, and much easier new opportunities than a man with no plan. GLA. I hold shares now to see what I get from the administration process... only thing that would change my mind now is a big buy from the hype merchant TC or his wife.
I perhaps did and you my friends are more than welcome to say told you so when the time comes and I will absolutely thank you. But please focus your efforts on getting the evidence and sharing it here. My efforts are best spent looking at how likely orders are going to materialise for the company and adjust my holdings accordingly.
troublesome - the issue with BT is absolutely **** poor communication. I perhaps should have kept shtum and waited for the presentation. There were specific questions to him about corrupt behavior he answered them. I am not a mind reader to say whether or not he was lying... giving him the benefit of the doubt again.
Nanogeddon take your grivences off line buddy to Tariq and your solicitors , tbh Im sick of the moaning. They dont add any value for me personally, I come on these boards occasionally for market intelligence not lack of it. FYI I have lost thousands with this share also I have held since 160p, still I remain unemotional.
troublesome I may be a gullible fool and one to see the best not worst in people. I can only see myself in BTs shoes and probability wise take any money and run is a bloody hard choice. I didn't even do it myself when the share reached 60p, that would have been the most sensible thing to do. As a person thinking in his shoes there is absolutely zero chance I would have known how this was going to end up, but end of the day he kept Nanoco in the game where during covid it should have been well and truely out of it. Time will tell if im an idiot or not.
Overall fair job by BT. I was to the least to say pee'd of with seeing the letter from Tariq this week, but unless it comes with some evidence not worth paper its written on, hence why he made it public well after his 7 day deadline. Unfortunately as it is one has to treat this company as a new start this year, and BT is right what an incredible platform to start again on. The company has cut its teeth, resourced correctly, gained invaluable experience etc etc. and as such should be treated as a solid growth stock. For whatever reason ii's have not bought it, I presume due to cloud of legal case casting shadow. That gone now this share should command market multipliers of semicon growth share, hopefully it will soon. BT has done over and above answering every single question sent to him at presentation (a very rare occurance by a CEO) to draw a line in the sand.. look to the future and fill you pint over half full now, otherwise move to the alcohol free stuff. GLA
If we shareholders were not consulted on the agreement amount and terms, we should challenge its validity in court. The shareholders we should argue that the agreement was not properly authorised by the board or was not in the best interests of the company. In such a case, a court would need to analyse the agreement and determine if it was valid. Get rid of board and new CEO will lead this... hopefully with criminal investigations to boot.
This cements my view that any settlement should have gone for shareholder vote?! WHY NOT?!! Snakes. I would legally now argue that settlment with Samsung is void by fact that it was not approved by shareholders.
Sack the lot and void the agreement with Samsung! On grounds of complicit relationship with them.
Guilty as charged!