Member Info for graking

Another 2 weeks to wait for any news. What a joke.

Darin Labrenz speak with forked tongue. UNLESS as I have said before he has changed his mind
and chosen not to report findings anymore whilst negotiating a "partnership". On the other hand, I never see the large miners reporting every time they find (or do not find) gold, silver, copper etc

since 3.45pm

Or perhaps he did due diligence and his lawyers advised and he then made a decision

Could result in a Holdings RNS on Monday

Well spotted Davethedumplin. We are on to something here. Am no scientist but this appears to show that those likely to suffer from Covid effects are within this low to missing Interferon range. Strongly suggests that the Phase 3 trial results will be a game changer. I would expect Synairgen are now well into negotiations with their favoured large Pharma. prior to a monster of an RNS.

Rockie -- Am coming from the angle that in view of its huge potential, you wouldn't sell just yet and nor would most. But when the CFO does and with prior business knowledge ?? Clearly no good news is imminent otherwise he would have held on. Hardly on his uppers.

In the light of yesterdays RNS and in particular today's unusually large price drop, I have emailed the TSX to ask them whether a CFO selling that many shares should be investigated. His action might well be be in order. As Company Secretary, he would be aware of any pending news announcements and the rules associated with Executive/Director share sales and it is clear that the price drop is a market reaction to his sale and clearly spooked by the fact that he would be in advance possession of business or financial information.

Wlaw1 - You were right about todays price. Whats your view for tomorrow. If I were the CEO, I would by now have sacked my FCO whose share sale has spooked the market AND his action has postponed any announcements for 2 weeks . On the other hand he may well be about to leave so chose to sell having prior knowledge of test results. Either way, the TSX needs to investigate.

and large volumes too

Peoplepower1 - Thanks for your extensive technical paper. You mention Tabs adn Musk said he had done away with them to ensure greater efficiency and cost reduction. That will also help were CPX to claim breach. But the announced battery design seems to be hugely different from the "flat" capacitor, dry or otherwise. As mentioned it does not totally write off a legal case thus my point about a partially successful claim were CPX prepared to take on Tesla on this new issue

If Canadian Company Law is similar to UK law, Directors are prohibited from share dealing within 2 weeks of any announcement or if they do then the announcement has to be postponed. In short, we cannot expect any business related news for the next fortnight at the very least. IMHO he is clearly jumping ship so am wondering if he has been asked to resign and is contracted to sell his options straight away and not prepared to wait for his termination announcement. If I am right, his termination will be reported today or tomorrow. Otherwise I am unable to determine why he would sell.

CUFC - not unusual for investors to test buy 1 or say 10 shares with no intention of buying, That process tells them the offer price and whether there are any sellers. Failure to cancel in the allotted grace of 12 seconds or so is a purchase - in error of course

7om86 - Musk was very careful to try and point out the difference between his grinding process compared to Maxwells which did imply he was trying to create a copyright bridge with third parties such as CPX. However a "flat" supercapacitor compared to a "rolled" is by itself too distant to be a total breach of copyright/patenting. However, if it can be shown that the construction of the incorporated materials are the same, then I accept t might be judged to be a partial breach and damages (or license fees) awarded . License fees would be a game changer for CPX who would then be offered a buy out by Musk or other battery manufacturers.

Musk stated that Lithium was readily available worldwide. He has a large stake in Nevada lithium exploration and clearly his intention is to use the clay based deposit for his US battery production in due course. He is good at hyping his products but then which manufacturer wouldn't. The message I took away was the huge cost reduction in his dry battery line. If other battery manufacturers do not somehow develop alternative patents, there wet battery vehicles will remain expensive and heavy. Tesla will rule the motoring world and to to ensure consumer choice he will buy out General Motors, Fiat, Jaguar etc which will then use his technology.

Peoplepower1 You suggest that a patent for "a form of" dry cell is held by CPX. I have checked and can find no such connection. In the meantime the markets see no clear connection and yesterdays false price has come to nothing. As I have said before, CPX has a promising niche wearables market and that is all they have. Making dubious and unsubstantiated links with Tesla via Maxwell is hyping a product beyond reason.

This chat room has become a Tesla love in with little - sorry NO evidence that Cap-XX products are or will ever be connected to Panasonic, Tesla or any one else's batteries. Todays price rise. A dead cat bounce ? I could go along with the optimism of getting cash from Tesla for a Maxwell breach but when Tesla takeover theories morphed into battery technology, it all started to sound quite bizarre

Until CPX can show they have a word beater in terms of sales volumes, nothing will change.

Brilliant considering todays rampant bear market

Received a reply 2 days ago to a question I sent to an independent respiratory expert at Cambridge Uni on the Synairgen trials. Answer was guarded but stated that until a peer review was published, the jury was out. In short, the medical profession cannot rely at all on an unaudited RNS. In the meantime we all have to watch price management according to the stock market movements alone. Not good whilst on the brink of total economic collapse.