Member Info for gr1bbler

...I would like some stonking Aqua Fuels test results by RNS tomorrow morning for the world to read about over their weekend morning coffee, followed by a signed MSC deal on Tuesday, so the PR machine can go into full swing before COP28 at the back end of next week. Please.

...and if I hadn't been fed up with funding the company year on year (to amounts totalling roughly JM's annual salary), then I would have been happy to fund the raise from new money. So I don't think I am a "fickle PI" and the responsibility has to rest somewhat with the company.

The only thing I was in a position to guarantee with any certainty was my allocation going into the company coffers. I sold at a loss and took the hit to give them the cash. If others didn't see the benefit of making a similar "sacrifice", that is their prerogative, though I wasn't in a position to influence that. It can't be proven that I negatively impacted others' choices in taking up the offer, though I do know the company got my cash.

"Don't think this does anything."

Can you explain? It enabled me to take up my allocation and the company to receive the funding, rather than me buying shares in the open market, which the company would have received no money from.

I sold a number of shares in the market to fund the open offer because, having previously funded multiple raises to only see my capital depreciate, I did not want to continue simply throwing money at a company that wasn't performing, though I did want to keep the lights on. I would therefore attribute the share price movement before the raise from similar activity to being a product of poor sentiment and historic performance on the company's part, not just me being a "fickle PI". If PIs fully support a rubbish company at every raise then of course it will be able to continue its activities ad infinitum, though there has to be some accountability on the company in encouraging supportive sentiment.

JackG, current spread is somewhere around 1.31/1.42.

Have been going over the project update slides from the AGM and couldn't help noticing that every note referencing a project milestone linked to a particular month points to the start of that month, with the exception of "Sign agreements with MSC, major trader and terminal". I may well be clutching at straws and reading too much into it but perhaps a further suggestion that there is a date set for mid-December to coincide with COP28?

Oh, I hope so.

Couldn't help yourself and just bought a few shares, didn't you Piggy?

Good luck!

I'd take a coach/cliff over being anywhere near another pump!

Thanks, Prep. Just re-watched and personally don't think he would have phrased it like that if there wasn't a sign off date pencilled in. Very exciting times indeed!

In cinemas this Christmas, Jason Miles (hopefully) stars in... The Moroccan Job!

Thanks and great find PR. If you're looking to get the deal done in December, SURELY the target HAS to be to get it done for this event so MSC can shout it from the rooftops. Such a massive opportunity to blow the roof off the marketing machine. What a result that would be and only two weeks to find out!

"Is that Lionel bloke not 46G who posts on here?"

No.

Woopsie.

I believe someone called Lionel did announce to those in attendance at last year's AGM that he was 46G when he asked his question. Though there could be more than one person called Lionel of course.

Can anyone with familiarity with this type of situation shed some light on what prospective impact it could have on existing shareholder dilution etc. Presumably with a very small market cap, they'd need to be given a sizeable chunk to make something worth their while or how might it work?

Speculation on this board also dragging down the Shell share price? ;)

Took the words right out of a lot of shareholders mouths there, I think!

I don't tend to read these types of articles that seem to largely be auto-generated but this one caught my eye:

https://simplywall.st/stocks/gb/energy/aim-qed/quadrise-shares/news/shareholders-may-be-a-bit-more-conservative-with-quadrise-pl

CFP, I think the key point is that WE'VE known it works, but now we should have a credible case study and solid data to back up the case for adopting bioMSAR, which was absent before. As an added bonus, we can even make pumps work too.

If you're selling and have made a quick 40% then good on you, but I am here for 50p and beyond! Really hope the company can build on this and quickly.

Nearly fell off my chair. We completed a trial. What a great day!

The biggest point for me is that this not only opens up the ability to more aggressively pursue other similar opportunities now we have the data, but adds further credibility in getting a refinery on board, as we have something that actually works. Let's hope this open the floodgates to the "multiple enquiries from interested parties" who have been "actively approaching QED" that we've been told about in the past. Now's the time for the board to show they can sell. Get that report finalised and then get on that phone to everyone who's shown an interest that these results apply to. Time to be proactive.