Member Info for gr1bbler

On the money.

I actually think it is encouraging they are getting traction. We are moving at a painfully, painfully slow speed, though IF MSC and Cargill are committed (as we are led to believe), and they are looking to nail down a proper roll out, then it will all be worth the wait.

In the meantime, it absolutely sucks.

Fairly sure you need shareholder approval for a director's loan from a Plc.

If the lawyers and decision-makers being tied up is indeed part of the problem (as we have been led to believe), then I don't think signing an agreement to end the war makes the problem just suddenly disappear in an instant. The war will have created issues that will extend beyond the swipe of the presidential pen. There may be resulting commercial disputes to resolve, insurance contracts to be amended, backlogs to sort out, new routes to agree, employee grievances to deal with. The list goes on.

So let's not get carried away.

Anyone have a sense of how heavily we still feature in their plans? Website seems to now have a whole host of products with a whole host of partners.

Our CEO, Peter Borup, recently sat down with

Shahjahan (Shah) Ahmed at SeaNews to discuss the critical, yet underutilised, role transitional fuel technologies will play in shipping’s low carbon future.

During the interview, Peter acknowledged the scale of the challenge that shipowners face when it comes to investing in viable clean fuels but emphasised that while “many owners want to do the right thing, they also need solution that work within existing operational realities".

This is where market-ready solutions like MSAR® and bioMSAR™ offer a clear route forward. They can help reduce operating costs as well as CO₂ and NOx emissions, whilst using existing vessel and bunkering infrastructure.

You can read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/dJAvHXtW

#MSAR #bioMSAR #marinefules #SustainableShipping

Or it was previously more advanced / less complex / had been longer in the queue / was a higher priority / there were stronger relationships in place.

I don't think we can "conclude" anything.

Similarly, the lawyers are probably working flat out at the moment reviewing insurance contracts, dealing with claims and dispute resolution, and regulatory compliance vis-a-vis the clusterfeck in the Strait of Hormuz!

This view is simplistic. Yes, lawyers work on legal matters but they also need to liaise with decisionmakers whose bandwidth is occupied by the strategic, operational, and financial performance of the business. They will also be dealing with fleet optimisation, global trade compliance, risk management, and profitability across the entire maritime supply chain, which probably trumps trials with Quadrise.

Yes, definitely there for the buffet, not business development activity that could result in them triggering options worth multiple millions of pounds. Slightly stale sandwiches that have been left out for too long in air conditioned rooms much more important!

Haha that actually made me laugh, HF. Sad but probably true. At least the scripts won't take much work each time.

All the best with the recovery.

Thanks, 46G and I agree with HF below.

Have seen 46G at previous AGMs and believe he has a genuine interest in the company as an investor.

I think it implies no regular update until then. Clearly, an RNS on one of the projects could come at any time.

I think it is important to make that distinction.

I see the clown is spouting off again on LinkedIn - now 4 posts on the latest QED post.

Our CEO Peter Borup has shared his insights with ship.energy following the recent MEPC 84.

As the discussion regarding the implementation of the IMO’s Net Zero Framework progress, Quadrise continues to stress the importance of implementable measures and incentives that give shipowners and operators the confidence to invest.

As Peter states, “We are losing valuable time if we insist on finding the ‘perfect fuel’ to the exclusion of transition technologies that offer early emissions reductions.”

Read the full article on ship.energy here: https://lnkd.in/eiV8FTE3

#Quadrise #Shipping #MEPC84 #Decarbonisation

I am hopeful for this month and think by end Q2 is a must. That should be ample time to iron out final, more trivial details based on the latest information provided by Peter.

The poster's job title on LinkedIn is "NOWHERE but open to offers". Tells you everything you need to know!

Some intellectually challenged types don't understand risk and investing and can't control their "big feelings" when things don't go their way. So they behave like children for attention when they realise they aren't quite as clever as they thought.

Diddums...

I see someone has copied some of the below posts as a comment on the Quadrise Geneva Dry post on LinkedIn.

Desperate.