Member Info for GPback

I read that too maestro. Very interesting and was it a suggestion by them?

Will lse, iii and advfn still support Churchill or will we all have to debate things "underground"?

"Investors can deal on NEX Exchange through all major stockbrokers - Cornhill Captal, who were also at the event, is one of 47, while online trading is possible through Share Centre and Jarvis Investment Management. Securities are eligible for inclusion in your SIPP as well as ISAS and can retain eligibility under the Enterprise Investment Scheme. Tax advantages and reliefs such as capital gains and stamp duty and business property relief from inheritance tax are all available."

We don't lose anything if you hold physical shares. We just trade (or not) on the NEX. As this is likely to be suspended now for a much longer period we may never trade again just get settled one way or another. Even if we actually delist we still own our respective share of the company.

Depends if they think they will win or not I bet. In the past I've read about spread bet companies pleasing themselves. Best read the small print.

I'm not surprised IG don't deal with NEX. Any CFD's etc may need converted. It is their call.

You can hold NEX stocks in an ISA so they are free of tax if you profit from them.

Not unless you wanted to buy some at 1p maestro as you know I did. It doesn't matter what sp it drops to as far as I can tell.

I don't see any affect to ISA holdings.

...... something would have to give. AIM companies often have dual listing on AIM and NEX. They now only have to comply with NEX rules which are less onorous.

They can annul and we can OOC settle. It doesn't stop us coming to an early close.

"Settlement agreed by the parties and proceeding discontinued at their request." That's what we need. £4 please.

Seems a very sensible summary of where we are. Thank you for posting it on lse.

Lol. This isn't a love in. It's a nasty market place. You leverage you need to know you can pay for it all. If you over leverage you have only yourself to blame. Blaming me isn't going to help. I've written to AIM as I said I would about forcing the trading again. I actually agree it won't trade until the stay of award is granted. After that I expect it to trade and if not I will ask AIM the reason. I feel sorry for the people trapped in suspension, and why shouldn't the shorters be able to close? This isn't about me this is about AIM rules and following them.

Well it's not up to the Board if AIM boots them out or insists they de-suspend the stock, it's up to AIM. What are they frightened of, a low sp. it makes no difference.

Maestro, everyone here is a capitalist. No, don't agree about delisting rather than coming out of suspension. I don't invest without knowing I can lose it all. This is AIM. The company can't hide in suspension forever. Investors have rights.

Right, we should be trading soon. DQ / CC should have asked for the stay of £9 mill to be decided by the 6 month point. I would have and it most likely will mean we should be trading again. I'm not bothered about those who are leveraged, that is their lookout and tbh they have had enough time to cover the monies. It's only right that we should be able to buy and sell.

The problem behind s quick annulment is it makes the original arbitration panel look like amateurs. If they annul so promptly it means that they made big errors in judgement. Apart from the 17 grounds, the biggest leverage in our favour is leaving the original award as precedence. It would give pretty much everyone an "out" in future cases. ICSID can't leave this hanging there to be used.

I think sperac is actually is asking maestro is what qualifies the other investor to be believed?

Lol