Member Info for gotreal

No one cares about your pathetic trades Ripley.....

Yes, I agree, but JLP has far greater potential than THS and has diversified its output lowering risk. Neither does it carry the risk of deep mining.

I see the usual moaners are chatting **** again .....

Good article on Unherd today about how much Copper, Nickel, Cobalt and Lithium will be required globally to hit the net zero target: https://unherd.com/thepost/britons-want-a-net-zero-referendum/

Ripley.... Nobody gives a ****.

Ripley...get stuffed

As a comparison, here is a snapshot of the Sable cobalt operation https://www.dropbox.com/s/ysmhpll3axj4v2w/Sable%20cobalt.png?dl=0 and here is an image of pink Cobalt in suspension in a test tube... ... https://www.dropbox.com/s/g3gzwecs7ryhodj/Cobalt%20pink%20Hydroxide%20in%20suspension.png?dl=0 . They look pretty similar to me!

It looks pretty pink to me on the video....

If as has been suggested the pictures show Cobalt hyydroxide then that is 54% by mass, Cobalt.

Aluminium is too bulky in most applications to get the same conductivity as copper. Then you have to respecify all of the manufacturing processes to use it. There is some displacement possible but it would take years for it to be meaningful.

World copper stocks only sufficient for 4.9 days of world demand according to Trafigura: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/commodities/copper-supply-outlook-inventory-shortage-5-days-global-demand-trafigura-2022-10 . Maybe Colin made the right call.....

Sounds a very one-sided agreement though... partner to finance the capex and then hand over the plant after the concession period. I have been invovled in a number of BOT (build, operate, transfer) projects in IT.... but the T is never fixed but optional...and in every case it has never happened as the skillset required to O after, given that the project is usually non-core for the contractor, isn't wortht the investment / hassle of trying to manage it. May be the case here too...we'll have to see, if JLP is the partner. I would have thought though Leon would much rather hang on to what he had built ...than create a potential competitor. The pickings will indeed need to be rich to want to do this.

Show us the proof.

Why would JLP commission the design of a processing plant when that is their USP?

edzi, I was referring to this rubbish: "LC needs to devote his efforts to the technical side of JLP. The cost to recover a ton of copper is still far too high. And it is unacceptable to bring Cobalt credits into the copper recovery costs, as these just hide how badly JLP is performing when it comes to recovery of copper." Just how badly JLP is performing... Unless Charles has inside knowledge of the chemistry of the tailings being processed and advanced chemical engineering skill then he is talking through his ....

So your an expoert in this area then are you, Charles? ;) And what is the basis for your disdain of Leon's chemical engineering skills?

You should sell up and move on....

If you want dividends now, buy a stock that pays them rather than a high growth stock that you keep bellyaching about for not paying them.

SLP has no diversification and no plans for growth; it is different beast to JP entirely.

Its not going down due to anything to do with JLP....