The main bullet points for me were. Refrac cost. $1.8 m or £1.4 m. So presumably means a chunk of the previous raise and new cash is going elsewhere. Expected pre refrac flow 0.5 to 1.0 mmscfd CCS at least 4 years. Too long to be of interest to me and a lot of others. Refrac COS 75% Actually more informative than expected. Gla.
Spot on TWB. They can never admit they are wrong. As for LSE they tend to take the easy option when someone complains about a post. As for them making a detailed investigation. Laughable. Atb.
Careful Conger or a certain poster will accuse you of deramping. Lol. Of course, with your longevity and track record, anyone who has been here more than 5 minutes will know you are not part of that mythical tribe. Atb.
Sorry guys. Gone under the radar? A good find? It was in the rns. Do agree Schlumberger would make a fantastic jv partner as they produced thr new refrac techniques recommendations. Atb.
Sparrowhawk. I didnt make it up and I can know that. In fact we all know that. The purpose of the refrac is to prove up the modified fracking techniques and enable to value the asset to get a better jv deal. We already knew that but Roland confirmed it in his Sharetalk interview. https://www.share-talk.com/roland-wessel-ceo-and-director-of-oilex-ltd-asxaimoex-interview-2/ Grom about 3 minutes in.
Jasper. Don't know if I'm being naive but can we be sure there was a leak? Just seemed like speculation coming to a head to me. I myself had been wondering for weeks if the delays meant they would run out of cash. Managed to partly convince myself the increase in gas prices might make it unnecessary. Not sure where you got the idea the refrac might only cost £750k when they raised £2 million specifically for that. Turns out even that wasn't enough. Not impressed by Roland on this.
Yes Gareth. They raised £2 million specifically for the refrac. I thought the whole point of the delay was to avoid the higher cost of getting the kit quicker. Now they say it's going to cost more anyway.