RE: UK borrowing more than the 2 World Wars? Game on! Go gold!!!4 Mar 2021 07:45
Well here it is out in the open now. Controversey about Covid Stats, which have been less than illuminating, but will occupy centre stage for medical and psycholgical research for the next centruy, well if we get that far. Here we go...
Here in Australia, this week’s data from the Bureau of Statistics, covering January 1 to November 24, 2020, registers 126,974 deaths, against an average of 127,872 over the past five years (lets not worry about standard deviations and all that science). Interestingly, influenza and pneumonia deaths in that 2020 period numbered 1,952, against the five-year average of 3,097.
Should we attribute that decline to the use of masks and social distancing, as we are encouraged to do, or the heroic positions of the State Pemiers and othe rpoliticians? ; or is it faintly possible the missing 1,000 people who would normally have died of flu and pneumonia are the ones who succumbed to COVID when it first arrived? Did the virus simply tip those teetering on the verge of death into an earlier quarter?
We, of course, cut ourselves off from the world, so perhaps our figures are artificially low. So let’s consider the “nightmare scenario” playing out in Britain.
Last month the UK’s Office of National Statistics added its provisional 2020 figures to a series that goes back almost 200 years. It shows a rate of 1043.5 deaths per 100,000 population, ahead of 2019’s number of 925.
I would describe that rise with the COVID-appropriate word “unprecedented”, except the rate has been higher before, most recently in 2008 (when the unprecedented global financial crisis arrived, raised blood pressures and must have had a tad more than a financial impact?), when I don’t believe the world shut down. Oh yes, and it was higher in every single year before 2008, right back to 1838, when the records begin. Whatever was happening back then?
So if the impact of deaths from COVID (and I think we all know by now we should be saying “with”, not “from”) is not as bad as it first appeared, why are British hospitals reported to be almost overflowing, at or near 90 per cent occupancy? (Mr Tibbles, please leap in?) Unprecedented again, until you note the country’s National Health Service has the entirely reasonable efficiency goal of having fewer than 15 per cent of beds lying vacant at any time.
Or might the fact that in the past 30 years Britain has reduced the number of hospital beds from 300,000 to 140,000, while adding 10 million to its population, shed some light on the situation?
I could go on buts thats enough...
good luck to all
the gnome