Member Info for ghin

VUL BS a lot. We're way beyond the times when 30k was a realistic contract price. It's delusional to base any calculation on that.

Other flaws include ignoring OPEX, that we only hold 49%, debt servicing, dilution, tax, etc.

Not to mention the other fatal flaws in his calculation.

Didn't he predict mythical multiple shifts and multiples of this volume? :)

This surely shoots past gross negligence straight into obvious fraud territory?...

Most likely historically

Needs proofreading. It's soooooo full of sloppy errors and inconsistencies.

Weren't we promised a load of permits, results, financing, etc. for the last quarter of the year? Asking for a friend.

Or activities.

Due, overdue, past due and repeat. Meanwhile grass goes up, stock trends down, KC and friends gets paid a lot. The story of holding EMH summed up.

Pretty sure Sonora will end up in litigation and a measly settlement in the distant future.

https://fortune.com/2024/10/12/mexico-president-claudia-sheinbaum-ev-production-tesla-elon-musk-trump-tariffs/

Doesn't look like she's any more sane and honest than the previous bunch.

It is based on the trade price compared to the midpoint price at the time.

Organise to give them walking papers.

Wow, I really need to start proofreading the result of predictive input. It's getting worse by the year.

It's EMH KC's word for God's sake. Nothing is gonna come this month, and when something does, it'll mean nothing. A DFS might randomly drop or never. This stock is a blind bet that it does and that is good - only to let down probably because the real change here is a binding offtake. About to be inked for a while apparently.

Lol, right.

Or 24.

Yeah, total BS. Just makes the CEO look even more incompetent. Originally saying the timelines coming just to say two months later that the responsible party won't even start looking at the timeline until some hardly related geo work is not done in a few weeks time. Fwit.

There's a good chance an average shuffle of another 4 people might be more competent and honest on average, so there's sense in it :)

Pretty plausible given the CEO's repeatedly proven contempt for shareholders tbh.

It's a pity though. We would benefit from a new CEO.