Member Info for ghin

Probably in Lala Land :)

EIA submitted? Probably EMH doesn't know it correctly then:

"The JTF grant is conditional on the Project Environmental Impact Assessment being submitted by 31 December 2025 and approval of the EIA by the Czech Ministry of Environment by 30 June 2026."

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EMH/quarterly-activitiesappendix-5b-cash-flow-report-gq12pwfks5zqzmy.html#:~:text=The%20JTF%20grant%20is%20conditional,Environment%20by%2030%20June%202026.

Funny how proud you were of your facts. The rest of your great response is similarly ignorant.

Another new handle riding the news cycle. You might want to get your facts right: EIA hasn't been submitted - it happens to be a condition for the JTF to do so by EOY. DFS has been near complete since like 2019. Funny you mentioned the year, if only we were there - I could have saved myself 6 years of voyage on KC's gravy train, throwing in one false hope after the next.

Also, please tell me about my script, I am keen to get insight :)

As far as I see, I just call out those that seem to do their best to create FOMO and take profit. My comment that triggered the ramper hate? Saying that all of this is conditional: a DFS wouldn't be. That elusive one. In theory, this time around, we only need to wait two more weeks. Though he confirmed imminent release a couple of times and we kept thinking "surely this time around". Well, probably, maybe.

For cyberbub: Yes. We have burned up all cash - again. Capital will need to be raised - again. Might still happen before / instead of a DFS - again. Hopefully not, despite of what the lunatics imagine, I'm still holding, at this point mostly out of the joy of gambling and to occasionally entertain rampers with a reality check (of course I know they'll dismiss, divert, get personal as the thread's title suggest).

The capex is a big question. The updated PFS said 645m USD or so. That was unrealistic then, even more so now. Someone floated 2bn. That's a fat number, perhaps that will work as a reality check.

In any case, good discussion on hotcopper.

Regardless, looks substantial at first glance. Let's hope it works out, there's some uncertainty left around permits.

Now we know how the permits worked out for the broader project by EOY 2024. Or was it 2023?

What, reminding people of the managements underperformance, historical events that justify caution and obvious ramper BS of tags that miraculously only show up to ride news cycles and otherwise their only contribution is name-calling? Please do filter me, lol.

Remains to be seen. Let's not spend money we don't have yet. Great DFS, EIA submitted, FID. Neither should be too far in theory (again) so before we start running celebratory laps let's just wait a little with the "deramper bashing". One would think EMH and similar in LSE have already served enough humble pies.

Except his guess is reasonable based on years of KC/EMH performance.

Last PFD update was 650 or so. Couple years inflation and increase of production as well as change of location could see it doubling in DFS. But 2bn is out of the question or this is simply not going to go ahead.

Where did you get that 2bn capex from, Fingers?

And where did we end, Fingers?

One RNS, DFS ready, past tense. That will do, the rest is BS.

Don't really care what's in written in emails or said to friendly hosts on YouTube.

RNS. And even then I'm a sceptic. :)

More likely you're in for a "surprise".

Why do put equivalence between calling out people ramping and conviction of the venture failing?

Anyhow, looking at past performance - of KM - that's pretty obviously the trajectory. What were hoping he is a fluke. Which, at certain average price, we can call gambling. So say that I'm gambling. For fun.

Ramping party, yay.

Well, I see a pattern. Encouraging RNS drops implying something good soon, not unreasonably before Christmas. Then nada. Sometimes and AGM passes by where shareholders might revolt. Sometimes you just need that authority to issue more and get away with it. I would like to be wrong but can't see this thing done and dusted as soon as people here think. I don't even dare to hope it'll actually be done and dusted ever. Still waiting for those Amapa permits that we haven't really heard about since :)

To be fair, I fully expect them to move the goal post. Not that it helps us because nothing ever gets delivered here.

Past tense is generally used to things that happened as a fact. While these have not.

Ah, the classic move of a troll with an agenda. "I make a bunch of unfounded statements and will tell people calling me out to prove the reverse statements." since that's basically impossible usually but can waste an asymmetric of time.

How about you prove that your statements are true? Not a select few, but all? How about the "DFS done and dusted"? Or the "grant approval" conveniently skipping the condition and the deadline? Factually even the latter is not true :)

Most of what pumpmachine posted is unfounded BS.

KC putting few weeks in an RNS?! Jesus, is it really still years away from release?! :)