Member Info for ghin

Building on Fingers slop, you mean. Oh, the ramping bubble buddies are always so keen to fluff each other's thingies up and get on the offensive.

You want critique of the slop? Ask AI to critique it for you. It will do whatever you want to believe.

Yet there still will be a sell off tomorrow and next week when the market really does understand that indeed, KC did manage to end up moving the goalpost again in the usual fashion, and people start to worry that he indeed moved it in the usual fashion :)

The birds stop mid air in the holiday period in Christmas. Next week is already shaky. DFS and EIA "some stage in December" is a pretty obvious BS, meaning January in the best case. Possibly without heads up, as usual, giving the market a flashback of the last time a DFS was coming in October, then December... Then March. Then "we'll come back to you on that". Circumstances are never the same but the man managed to deliver a capital raise when everyone expected the DFS more times I care to count.

Now I do think this time is somewhat different. But not without slip ups, bad communication - dare I say contempt - and the consequences to the share price. Before the inevitable capital raise. KC is either an idiot or a crook.

Well, the way he held his left arm with his right hand together with the shift from "first half (blink blink nose touch)" to a repeated "at some stage in ..." barely a week later does not instill too much confidence in him.

Please do educate me Fingers. You could start it with the list of predictions you made over the decade that actually materialized. Then maybe continue with DNNs and the transformer architecture. :)

Just Skelly or "all of her accounts"? Cause' I'm really very entertained about that. Either way, you gotta keep that bubble intact at all cost.

Btw Fingers, I think you didn't use AI for that "poem". That knows how to use punctuation. I have an excuse. Unlike for Skelly, English is nothing but a second language to me.

Really, funny, I had the same concept about the ramping bubble buddies.

Or it's one of those where a confused old man anthropomorpises a large language model and asks for bubble reinforcement from it - which it is happy to satisfy given its RL training of the expected conversational stance for a chatbot. He then diligently copies that slop here as if that was not total garbage, moments after a ramper complains about unfounded negativity from others who don't share a bubble with him. Yeah, another point of view, I know, it's upsetting.

Anyhow, tic-toc. The saying goes: buy the rumor, sell the news. It is generally the lack of news people sell with EMH as the Oz trading underlined that.

But I guess this copy-pasted slop is fine :)

Good for you (seriously!)

I'm here since 2015. But longer than most cheerleaders (not referring to you, but those strictly reality grounded people who see offtakes and all time highs in a month based on literally no facts)

Well, perhaps she projects the (plentiful, spectacular, scandalous, ...) failures of the past a little bit too rigidly but she's not wrong yet. Hopefully she will be but that's still just a hope, not a fact.

Let's get that DFS and a decent one on time this time. That might change her fact based protections a bit more to your liking.

We'll see that if the goods are delivered and the goods are good.

It would be silly not to look at processing tin and tungsten at these concentrations but I don't recall the flowsheet giving to much attention to them. I hope the DFS will clarify the matter.

Fairycoin

That price has little to do with the fluctuating spot price or long term forecasts. It is the average price estimate for the LOM.

Can't speak for Skelly but I have no reason to doubt you. I remember you stating a while back near the middle of the year that even October won't happen. I found it to be curiously certain statement amidst the then current wave of baseless enthusiasm.

Any hint of how such a late drop of the DFS will allow for the EIA to be submitted? It's clear that a "draft" must already be circulating and it could be used as basis for preparing the EIA for submission.

However:

- there's only so much time you can claim that all you have is a "draft" hence it's not inside information that should be released, especially if it is being used and circulated

- the DFS information must be published before the inherently public EIA goes in

Thanks

Facts are mostly sour looking back, GM. Dreams are sweet as a constant. A fact is that they have a tendency here to not come true. Two legs firm on the ground makes the money, flying towards the light like a month does not. Now there's a reason why some might dislike this perspective and I have no respect for those.

I think that list sort of illustrates the built in confirmation bias GM.

Jones64: totally agree with you in principle. Personally I find the relentless childish cheering as much exhausting as the opposing force (Skelly). Would be nice to see everyone moving towards the center. Have statements based on facts not wishes so people like me won't feel completed to come in and point out the obvious.

Again with the incorrect use of past tense. The company hasn't proven her wrong - yet. I mean I would appreciate a little disappointment and finally get a DFS, EIA, definitive grant news (instead of conditional) and FID. I hold more here than most cheerleaders for longer than I would like.

But I still think it's more likely we will see a capital raise before these. History suggests. Now sure, the pattern can't hold forever. But unfortunately we had a little too many "surely this must be it" rallies.

Hehe, I see! Nice troll technique LL! One must appreciate a pro.

However the facts remain. An actual, up to date for the new mine plan, new transport requirements, new processing site and method still needs to be submitted, as clearly stated in the latest quarterly.

Yup, it is dependent.