I'm not worried23 Nov 2018 13:35
I follow pharma and have invested in pharma for a number of years. I also stay close to regulatory requirements for public companies like L&G and understand that they operate differently than those like Woodford. It's my opinion that L&G had to liquidate some as their requirements for investing are monitored and governed and when midatech management sold off a portion of the company then L&G had to follow suit as required per a public company. Midatech sold off assets, patents and property to restructure. Woodford doesn't fall under the same requirements for regulatory assets and investing, so it's likely that his fund won't follow. Now for a few words on drug progress and next steps, it's of my opinion that the management team is now fully in the drivers seat with the road wide open in front of them, question is now which exit to take? To partner or not? To go alone? To split the drug and partner a portion? Choices are numerous but the decision will be crucially important for all. As a person who studies pharma I know one thing for certain, and that is that in human tests are what every young company aspire to reach. Midatech has in 5 or 6 years built a manufacturing plant, tested variations of formulas and secured dozens of patents. They've moved from animal to in-human tests and now are showing remarkable results. I suspect that more positive news of these remarkable results are soon to come, trial updates on 110 program as well as next steps for Liver disease plus a decision on whether to partner or not should all be coming over the next weeks and months. So L&G sells a portion of their holdings in order to meet regulatory balance is really not the concern for me. My concern is what exit the management team decides to take as they're in the drivers seat here, and their decision will have a major impact on the future of midatech and the shareholders. These decisions can't be made with a snap of the finger or planned out of irrational motivation. Frankly I'm glad that the management and board hasn't came out with some news release addressing the decline in share price, as in my opinion they have much bigger things to consider. I'm not worried to any real degree of losing sleep or fretting. It's my opinion that the share price may languish and decline a bit more into year end as tax selling and repositioning occurs. But I also suspect a strong start to the new year and potentially it's driven by a snap back in AIM and pharma investing and perhaps just perhaps a clue to decision as to which proverbial exit that the management team has decided to take. As too me that's the real driver moving forward, that single decision as to the best way to market the drug predicated on those in human results. That's a key, key, key decision to make as it will set the path of the company moving forward as well as financial returns for the short term 3-5 years. No too me that single decision alone is so vital, not the daily fluctuations.